From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 12:42:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104114231.GB1702@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515054014.12987.75.camel@amazon.co.uk>
On Thu 2018-01-04 08:20:14, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 03:11 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 04/01/2018 02:59, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >> But then, exactly because the retpoline approach adds quite some cruft
> > >> and leaves something to be desired, why even bother?
> > >
> > > Performance
> >
> > Dunno. If I care about mitigating this threat, I wouldn't stop at
> > retpolines even if the full solution has pretty bad performance (it's
> > roughly in the same ballpark as PTI). But if I don't care, I wouldn't
> > want retpolines either, since they do introduce a small slowdown (10-20
> > cycles per indirect branch, meaning that after a thousand such papercuts
> > they become slower than the full solution).
> >
> > A couple manually written asm retpolines may be good as mitigation to
> > block the simplest PoCs (Linus may disagree), but patching the compiler,
> > getting alternatives right, etc. will take a while. The only redeeming
> > grace of retpolines is that they don't require a microcode update, but
> > the microcode will be out there long before these patches are included
> > and trickle down to distros... I just don't see the point in starting
> > from retpolines or drawing the line there.
>
> No, really. The full mitigation with the microcode update and IBRS
> support is *slow*. Horribly slow.
What is IBRS? Invalidate BRanch prediction bufferS?
> By using retpoline, we avoid the need to set IBRS on *every* entry into
> the kernel. It gives you *most* of that performance back.
>
> It's horrid, but it seems to be the best option we have. And in my
> original patch set, it goes away almost completely if it isn't being
> used. (Apart from the fact that your eyes may still bleed; I can't do
> anything about that. Sorry).
Bleeding eyes sound like quite serious side-effect :-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-03 23:09 Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86/retpoline: Define retpoline indirect thunk and macros Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86/retpoline/crypto: Convert crypto assembler indirect jumps Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86/retpoline/entry: Convert entry " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86/retpoline/ftrace: Convert ftrace " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86/retpoline/hyperv: Convert " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86/retpoline/crypto: Convert xen " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86/retpoline/checksum32: Convert " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86/retpoline/irq32: " Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86/retpoline: Finally enable retpoline for C code Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 8:28 ` Greg KH
2018-01-04 8:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] retpoline/taint: Taint kernel for missing retpoline in compiler Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 0:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-04 0:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-01-03 23:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] retpoline/objtool: Disable some objtool warnings Andi Kleen
2018-01-03 23:51 ` Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel Linus Torvalds
2018-01-04 0:00 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 0:09 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 0:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-04 0:15 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 0:19 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-05 2:01 ` james harvey
2018-01-05 10:40 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-05 12:29 ` james harvey
2018-01-05 12:06 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 0:29 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 0:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-04 0:38 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 0:40 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 8:15 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 15:53 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 15:55 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 0:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-04 0:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-04 0:18 ` David Lang
2018-01-04 1:00 ` Paul Turner
2018-01-04 1:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 1:59 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 2:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 8:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 11:42 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2018-01-04 11:47 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 14:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 14:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 15:29 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 15:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-04 16:15 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-04 20:00 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-04 20:05 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-04 23:47 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-05 0:06 ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-05 0:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-04 16:52 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-04 15:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 16:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-04 17:04 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 17:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-04 17:13 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-04 17:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-04 18:05 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-04 14:55 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 18:24 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04 19:57 ` Jon Masters
2018-01-05 0:41 ` Jon Masters
2018-01-05 0:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-05 4:11 ` Jon Masters
2018-01-05 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 10:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-08 20:42 ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/tboot: Unbreak tboot with PTI enabled tip-bot for Dave Hansen
2018-01-08 20:53 ` Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 21:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-01-10 0:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-10 1:11 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-10 16:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-05 6:49 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-05 6:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-05 7:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-07 14:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-07 17:21 ` David Lang
2018-01-07 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-07 17:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-07 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-07 22:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 9:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-08 16:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-08 16:53 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-05 12:12 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-09 1:44 ` Samir Bellabes
[not found] ` <CAL9bgJ8XNJgCtxR6+M+Vm9eDBVZ4Dyi_-Lt-Q1ei9N=TE2c6cg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-07 5:04 ` Fwd: " Kiernan Hager
2018-01-07 6:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-07 14:01 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-07 17:47 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-07 18:01 ` Ivan Ivanov
2018-01-07 18:16 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-04 11:26 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04 11:54 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-04 20:08 ` Jon Masters
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-04 2:00 Andi Kleen
2018-01-04 11:49 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-04 12:09 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-04 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-12 8:20 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2018-02-23 21:10 Ywe Cærlyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180104114231.GB1702@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox