From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 16:09:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180104190903.GB20593@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512738826-2628-3-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Em Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 09:13:42PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> In the default 'perf record' configuration, all samples are processed,
> to create the HEADER_BUILD_ID table. So it's very easy to get the
> first/last samples and save the time to perf file header via the
> function write_sample_time().
>
> Later, at post processing time, perf report/script will fetch
> the time from perf file header.
So, at this point I was expecting that that record would be present on
the perf.data file:
[acme@jouet perf]$ perf record --timestamp-boundary sleep 1
Cannot read kernel map
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (7 samples) ]
[acme@jouet perf]$ perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE | wc -l
7
[acme@jouet perf]$ perf report -D | grep PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE_TIME
[acme@jouet perf]$
What am I doing wrong?
To clarify, this is with just the first two patches in this series
applied.
- Arnaldo
> Change log:
> -----------
> v7: Just update the patch description according to Arnaldo's suggestion.
>
> v6: Currently '--buildid-all' is not enabled at default. So the walking
> on all samples is the default operation. There is no big overhead
> to calculate the timestamp boundary in process_sample_event handler
> once we already go through all samples. So the timestamp boundary
> calculation is enabled by default when '--buildid-all' is not enabled.
>
> While if '--buildid-all' is enabled, we creates a new option
> "--timestamp-boundary" for user to decide if it enables the
> timestamp boundary calculation.
>
> v5: There is an issue that the sample walking can only work when
> '--buildid-all' is not enabled. So we need to let the walking
> be able to work even if '--buildid-all' is enabled and let the
> processing skips the dso hit marking for this case.
>
> At first, I want to provide a new option "--record-time-boundaries".
> While after consideration, I think a new option is not very
> necessary.
>
> v3: Remove the definitions of first_sample_time and last_sample_time
> from struct record and directly save them in perf_evlist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 3 +++
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> index 5a626ef..3eea6de 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
> @@ -430,6 +430,9 @@ Configure all used events to run in user space.
> --timestamp-filename
> Append timestamp to output file name.
>
> +--timestamp-boundary::
> +Record timestamp boundary (time of first/last samples).
> +
> --switch-output[=mode]::
> Generate multiple perf.data files, timestamp prefixed, switching to a new one
> based on 'mode' value:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 98da8cb..6db7b5a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct record {
> bool no_buildid_cache_set;
> bool buildid_all;
> bool timestamp_filename;
> + bool timestamp_boundary;
> struct switch_output switch_output;
> unsigned long long samples;
> };
> @@ -409,8 +410,15 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
> {
> struct record *rec = container_of(tool, struct record, tool);
>
> - rec->samples++;
> + if (rec->evlist->first_sample_time == 0)
> + rec->evlist->first_sample_time = sample->time;
> +
> + rec->evlist->last_sample_time = sample->time;
>
> + if (rec->buildid_all)
> + return 0;
> +
> + rec->samples++;
> return build_id__mark_dso_hit(tool, event, sample, evsel, machine);
> }
>
> @@ -435,9 +443,11 @@ static int process_buildids(struct record *rec)
>
> /*
> * If --buildid-all is given, it marks all DSO regardless of hits,
> - * so no need to process samples.
> + * so no need to process samples. But if timestamp_boundary is enabled,
> + * it still needs to walk on all samples to get the timestamps of
> + * first/last samples.
> */
> - if (rec->buildid_all)
> + if (rec->buildid_all && !rec->timestamp_boundary)
> rec->tool.sample = NULL;
>
> return perf_session__process_events(session);
> @@ -1621,6 +1631,8 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
> "Record build-id of all DSOs regardless of hits"),
> OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "timestamp-filename", &record.timestamp_filename,
> "append timestamp to output filename"),
> + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "timestamp-boundary", &record.timestamp_boundary,
> + "Record timestamp boundary (time of first/last samples)"),
> OPT_STRING_OPTARG_SET(0, "switch-output", &record.switch_output.str,
> &record.switch_output.set, "signal,size,time",
> "Switch output when receive SIGUSR2 or cross size,time threshold",
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-04 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-08 13:13 [PATCH v7 0/6] perf report/script: Support percent and multiple range in --time option Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] perf header: Record first sample time and last sample time in perf file header Jin Yao
2018-01-11 6:21 ` [tip:perf/core] perf header: Add infrastructure to record first and last sample time tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time " Jin Yao
2018-01-04 19:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-01-05 1:15 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-05 12:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-05 22:55 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-11 6:22 ` [tip:perf/core] perf record: Record the first and last sample time in the header tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] perf util: Create function to parse time percent Jin Yao
2018-01-08 14:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-08 14:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-09 1:18 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-11 6:22 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] perf util: Create function to perform multiple time range checking Jin Yao
2018-01-11 6:22 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] perf report: support time percent and multiple time ranges Jin Yao
2018-01-08 14:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-08 14:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-08 14:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-08 15:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-08 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-09 2:02 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-11 6:23 ` [tip:perf/core] perf report: Support " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-08 13:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] perf script: support " Jin Yao
2018-01-11 6:23 ` [tip:perf/core] perf script: Support " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2017-12-13 14:28 ` [PATCH v7 0/6] perf report/script: Support percent and multiple range in --time option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-12-14 0:48 ` Jin, Yao
2017-12-14 14:08 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180104190903.GB20593@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).