From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757308AbeAHOAM (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:00:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48184 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751335AbeAHOAL (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:00:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:00:08 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Lawall Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen Subject: Re: perf: documentation for cycles_no_execute event Message-ID: <20180108140008.GA17156@krava> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Mon, 08 Jan 2018 14:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 11:58:42AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > Hello, hi, adding Andi in cc, he should be able to answer this thanks, jirka > > Many of the x86 pipeline.json files have the brief description "Total > execution stalls" for both CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE and > CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_TOTAL. Should the case for > CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE have a brief description that mentions > cycles? Some of the files do have a public description that mentions > cycles, eg broadwellde/pipeline.json has "Counts number of cycles nothing > is executed on any execution port.", but others (eg ivytown/pipeline.json) > just have "Total execution stalls." twice. Maybe "Cycles where nothing is > executed" would be ok for CYCLE_ACTIVITY.CYCLES_NO_EXECUTE? > > thanks, > julia