From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933706AbeAHOqE (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:46:04 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:42792 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933656AbeAHOp6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:45:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:45:58 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: NeilBrown Cc: Oleg Drokin , Andreas Dilger , James Simmons , lkml , lustre , Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] staging: lustre: lnet: convert selftest to use workqueues Message-ID: <20180108144558.GA6826@kroah.com> References: <151356013394.15912.9645528414310488005.stgit@noble> <151356031919.15912.12406337913485020577.stgit@noble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <151356031919.15912.12406337913485020577.stgit@noble> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:25:19PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote: > Instead of the cfs workitem library, use workqueues. > > As lnet wants to provide a cpu mask of allowed cpus, it > needs to be a WQ_UNBOUND work queue so that tasks can > run on cpus other than where they were submitted. This patch doesn't apply to my tree :( > apply_workqueue_atts needs to be exported for lustre to use it. That feels really odd, why is lustre so "special" that the normal workqueue api doesn't work properly for it? I've dropped this, and the next patch, from my queue now. Please fix up and resend and justify why lustre is so odd :) thanks, greg k-h