From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com, Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 11:15:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108191542.379478-9-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180108191542.379478-1-tj@kernel.org>
The RCU protection has been expanded to cover both queueing and
completion paths making ->queue_rq_srcu a misnomer. Rename it to
->srcu as suggested by Bart.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 14 +++++++-------
include/linux/blk-mq.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 54ecb2c..071f396 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ void blk_mq_quiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
- synchronize_srcu(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
else
rcu = true;
}
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
rcu_read_unlock();
else
- srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(hctx->srcu, srcu_idx);
}
static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
rcu_read_lock();
else
- *srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ *srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->srcu);
}
static void blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(struct request *rq, u64 gstate)
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void blk_mq_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
has_rcu = true;
else
- synchronize_srcu(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
hctx->nr_expired = 0;
}
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
- cleanup_srcu_struct(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ cleanup_srcu_struct(hctx->srcu);
blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(hctx);
blk_free_flush_queue(hctx->fq);
@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
goto free_fq;
if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
- init_srcu_struct(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+ init_srcu_struct(hctx->srcu);
blk_mq_debugfs_register_hctx(q, hctx);
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tag_set)
{
int hw_ctx_size = sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx);
- BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, queue_rq_srcu),
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, srcu),
__alignof__(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx)) !=
sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx));
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 460798d..8efcf49 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
#endif
/* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
- struct srcu_struct queue_rq_srcu[0];
+ struct srcu_struct srcu[0];
};
struct blk_mq_tag_set {
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-08 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 19:15 [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: move hctx lock/unlock into a helper Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:57 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-08 20:15 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 22:55 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 23:27 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-08 23:33 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-09 7:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-09 15:22 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-09 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-09 16:19 ` tj
2018-01-09 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 21:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 15:46 ` tj
2018-01-08 23:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 15:46 ` tj
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: use blk_mq_rq_state() instead of testing REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: make blk_abort_request() trigger timeout path Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 16:02 ` tj
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE usages from blk-mq Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 23:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 23:47 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-08 23:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu Bart Van Assche
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-09 16:29 [PATCHSET v5] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 16:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180108191542.379478-9-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbacik@fb.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox