From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: lennart@poettering.net, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
ANGELO RUOCCO <220530@studenti.unimore.it>
Subject: Re: unify the interface of the proportional-share policy in blkio/io
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 11:52:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109195205.GP3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56EFD7A1-A894-410D-A923-E33911ED4647@linaro.org>
Hello, Paolo.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 08:00:02PM +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> The solution for the second type of parameters may prove useful to
> unify also the computation of statistics for the throttling policy.
>
> Does this proposal sound reasonable?
So, the above should work too but I wonder whether we could do this
simpler. Frankly, I wouldn't mind if cfq and bfq can't be mixed on a
system - e.g. they can be built together but you can't enable bfq on
some devides and cfq on others. If we do that, all we need to do is
just removing / adding cftypes when either gets activated which cgroup
already does.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-04 19:00 unify the interface of the proportional-share policy in blkio/io Paolo Valente
2018-01-09 19:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-09 19:53 ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-09 22:28 ` Paolo Valente
2018-01-10 15:01 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180109195205.GP3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=220530@studenti.unimore.it \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox