From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 3/4] perf/x86/intel: drain PEBS buffer in event read
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:39:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110103929.GB18942@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515424516-143728-4-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 07:15:15AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>
> When the PEBS interrupt threshold is larger than one, there is no way to
> get exact auto-reload times and value needed for event update unless
> flush the PEBS buffer.
>
> Drain the PEBS buffer in event read when large PEBS is enabled.
>
> For the threshold is one, even auto-reload is enabled, it doesn't need
> to be specially handled. Because auto-reload is only effect when event
> overflow. There is no overflow in event read.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 9 +++++++++
> arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 09c26a4..bdc35f8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -2060,6 +2060,14 @@ static void intel_pmu_del_event(struct perf_event *event)
> intel_pmu_pebs_del(event);
> }
>
> +static void intel_pmu_read_event(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + if (event->attr.precise_ip)
> + return intel_pmu_pebs_read(event);
check for (event->hw.flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD)
would be more accurate?
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 15:15 [RESEND PATCH V2 0/4] bug fix mmap read and rdpmc read in large PEBS kan.liang
2018-01-08 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH V2 1/4] perf/x86/intel: fix event update for auto-reload kan.liang
2018-01-10 10:22 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-10 14:31 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-24 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-24 15:45 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-08 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH V2 2/4] perf/x86: introduce read function for x86_pmu kan.liang
2018-01-08 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH V2 3/4] perf/x86/intel: drain PEBS buffer in event read kan.liang
2018-01-10 10:39 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-01-10 14:31 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 11:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 15:21 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 15:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-16 18:49 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-18 9:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-18 13:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-18 14:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-08 15:15 ` [RESEND PATCH V2 4/4] perf/x86: fix: disable userspace RDPMC usage for large PEBS kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110103929.GB18942@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox