From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: RCU: Call touch_nmi_watchdog() while printing stall warnings
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 06:57:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110145743.GD3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110053450.GA1063@jagdpanzerIV>
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 02:34:50PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Tejun, while we are at it, shall we also touch NMI in show_workqueue_state()?
> I suppose that show_pwq() can be quite verbose on some systems, can't it?
>
> for instance: sysrq-t [irq] -> show_workqueue_state()
Ah, it's less likely but definitely possible.
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 9960f8842b31..649c00a9af12 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
> +#include <linux/nmi.h>
>
> #include "workqueue_internal.h"
>
> @@ -4473,6 +4474,8 @@ void show_workqueue_state(void)
> if (pwq->nr_active || !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works))
> show_pwq(pwq);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pwq->pool->lock, flags);
> +
> + touch_nmi_watchdog();
Can you send a patch w/ signed-off-by adding touch_nmi_watchdog() to
both outer loops in that function. Theoretically, we can have a lot
of pools too.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 3:52 Can RCU stall lead to hard lockups? Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 4:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 14:11 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 15:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 18:47 ` [PATCH] RCU: Call touch_nmi_watchdog() while printing stall warnings Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 18:52 ` [PATCH trivial-v2] " Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 20:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 5:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-10 14:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-11 0:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-02-02 23:44 ` Can RCU stall lead to hard lockups? Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-03 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-07 2:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-07 2:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-07 2:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2018-02-07 3:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110145743.GD3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).