From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wangnan0@huawei.com" <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"yao.jin@linux.intel.com" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/12] perf mmap: discard legacy interface for mmap read
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:52:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180112105249.GB24958@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F077537FFC0E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:28:07PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:08:49AM -0800, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Discards perf_mmap__read_backward and perf_mmap__read_catchup.
> > No tools
> > > use them.
> > >
> > > There are tools still use perf_mmap__read_forward. Keep it, but add
> > > comments to point to the new interface for future use.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/mmap.c | 50 ++++----------------------------------------------
> > > tools/perf/util/mmap.h | 3 ---
> > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> > > index d0ca3ba..650e0a7 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mmap.c
> > > @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ static union perf_event *perf_mmap__read(struct
> > perf_mmap *map,
> > > return event;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * legacy interface for mmap read.
> > > + * Don't use it. Use perf_mmap__read_event().
> > > + */
> >
> > could we get rid of it then? looks like it's not much work,
> > seems it's used only in:
> >
>
> To get rid of it, it has to introduce the whole
> perf_mmap__read_init/_read_event/_done.
>
> Besides perf top, kvm and trace need to be changed.
> There are also 11 perf test cases need to be changed as well.
>
> I think that would make current patch series too huge.
> I can submit a separated patch series later to get rid of
> the legacy interface. Is it OK?
ok
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-12 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-21 18:08 [PATCH V3 00/12] perf top overwrite mode kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 01/12] perf evlist: remove stale mmap read for backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 02/12] perf mmap: factor out function to find ringbuffer position kan.liang
2018-01-10 15:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-10 19:31 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:26 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 03/12] perf mmap: discard 'prev' in perf_mmap__read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 04/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_done kan.liang
2018-01-02 7:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-03 14:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-04 2:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-04 14:00 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-09 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-09 15:12 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 12:00 ` Namhyung Kim
2018-01-11 14:40 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:27 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 05/12] perf mmap: introduce perf_mmap__read_event kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 06/12] perf test: update mmap read functions for backward-ring-buffer test kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 07/12] perf mmap: discard legacy interface for mmap read kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 08/12] perf top: check per event overwrite term kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:29 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-12 14:58 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 16:46 ` Liang, Kan
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 09/12] perf evsel: expose perf_missing_features.write_backward kan.liang
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 10/12] perf top: add overwrite fall back kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-12 11:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 11/12] perf top: switch default mode to overwrite mode kan.liang
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 21:30 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-11 14:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-12-21 18:08 ` [PATCH V3 12/12] perf top: check the latency of perf_top__mmap_read kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180112105249.GB24958@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox