From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933086AbeAOMYS (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:24:18 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60148 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754683AbeAOMYQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:24:16 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E1E8821775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=leon@kernel.org Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:24:11 +0200 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , David Miller , Networking , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Eran Ben Elisha , Saeed Mahameed , Eugenia Emantayev , Mark Bloch Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the net tree Message-ID: <20180115122411.GA15760@mtr-leonro.local> References: <20180115115321.1d1abc11@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RUh7Gb6wQL2PrpWP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180115115321.1d1abc11@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: --RUh7Gb6wQL2PrpWP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:53:21AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c > > between commits: > > 8978cc921fc7 ("{net,ib}/mlx5: Don't disable local loopback multicast traffic when needed") > 72f36be06138 ("net/mlx5: Fix mlx5_get_uars_page to return error code") > > from the net tree and commits: > > 16c1975f1032 ("IB/mlx5: Create profile infrastructure to add and remove stages") > c8b8992446a9 ("IB/mlx5: Move loopback initialization to the corresponding stage") > > from the rdma tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > Thanks, Stephen. It looks right to me. --RUh7Gb6wQL2PrpWP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkhr/r4Op1/04yqaB5GN7iDZyWKcFAlpcnWsACgkQ5GN7iDZy WKf5Lg/9Hxtq8ei4jBInbhSAP9bXsiikHHBFf14y8Wp9BfbBzye3J/klvJUAw2LV QmxLYufVJUng5z9r0RLmywPTpuSjJpYl4X0aAAJ7GdAl0z6BOIA/5DM3eBzS++Z2 jUmjeDeCRP3hDJbPFT/t99aQa8xJNg570koKLswFUf4gaaexptUmcDV1FjxJtcEM 6qK8tC6xWIgyBOTihJPA1YAgEoJrfASEhp9IbjpUhVCnaG/49dbO2NPzWGr56Oe9 3pjv6bIUJlDcj045zCtbSyaSRRckcjOo+OeH8hr5ZGlPbRsT5OfgX5EcFm1ZZWcR zp+zUYUPf6owoF+eDjj6qVccCNhyy2LAxIRaemGl6vk1RDTbVXZ2Aw7xScVFayuB wNYmhhw0vjF7URZzwWqt/GgawfRJYvW4Filqf8DBc5MPr+VasL5c5GL5gmZQRoIh YxQSbsonl0Cy8tlipT04iUSpuekO3Uhsj3Wmkzcj1grmt+TDsmDVki5Vp7po+eT6 yWlVvUU2/Njay8pHLsH1s0ednYzwEk3NcGSoQiXIJk4uWnkMb0hWI4PoHa4fKsPk W0zQEpZGwgjMvz9xpBLjBOxdLU9but1wbgBftM1c7HVP0cHi+TUzI3YaeoXL5dX1 0SxPBGhu7c0GssukXNEPc0nqZo4S1ugUaacsexpLb39QoDJzHi4= =sbJ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RUh7Gb6wQL2PrpWP--