From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] perf: Follow-up patches to improve time slice
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:55:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116115519.GA18544@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515596433-24653-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:00:25PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> It's follow-up patches to improve the perf time slice feature
> (perf report/script --time xxx)
>
> 1. Improve the error message
> perf report: Improve error msg when no first/last sample time found
> perf script: Improve error msg when no first/last sample time found
>
> 2. Fix an issue that illegal percent was accepted previously (e.g. 1abc%)
> perf util: Improve error checking for time percent input
>
> 3. Omit the slice index if possible. For example,
> perf report --stdio --time 10%/1 is equivalent to
> perf report --stdio --time 10%
>
> perf util: Support no index time percent slice
>
> 4. Add indication of time slices in perf report header.
> perf report: Add an indication of what time slices are used
>
> 5. Remove the time slices number limitation in perf report/script
> perf util: Allocate time slices buffer according to number of comma
> perf report: Remove the time slices number limitation
> perf script: Remove the time slices number limitation
>
> Jin Yao (8):
> perf report: Improve error msg when no first/last sample time found
> perf script: Improve error msg when no first/last sample time found
> perf util: Improve error checking for time percent input
> perf util: Support no index time percent slice
> perf report: Add an indication of what time slices are used
> perf util: Allocate time slices buffer according to number of comma
> perf report: Remove the time slices number limitation
> perf script: Remove the time slices number limitation
from quick look it looks ok
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 15:00 [PATCH v1 0/8] perf: Follow-up patches to improve time slice Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] perf report: Improve error msg when no first/last sample time found Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:34 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] perf script: " Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] perf util: Improve error checking for time percent input Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:35 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] perf util: Support no index time percent slice Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] perf report: Add an indication of what time slices are used Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] perf util: Allocate time slices buffer according to number of comma Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] perf report: Remove the time slices number limitation Jin Yao
2018-01-16 14:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-17 16:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-10 15:00 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] perf script: " Jin Yao
2018-01-17 16:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jin Yao
2018-01-16 11:55 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-01-16 12:31 ` [PATCH v1 0/8] perf: Follow-up patches to improve time slice Jin, Yao
2018-01-16 14:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-17 1:18 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116115519.GA18544@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox