From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has()
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:28:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116143241.236771093@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20180116142825.376986833@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-objtool-static_cpu_has.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2867 bytes --]
Unlike the jump_label bits, static_cpu_has is implemented with
alternatives. We use the new type field to distinguish them from any
other alternatives
Like jump_labels, make static_cpu_has set static_jump_dest on the
instructions after the static branch such that we can assert on it.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
tools/objtool/special.c | 11 +++++++++++
tools/objtool/special.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -636,6 +636,12 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
fake_jump->ignore = true;
if (!special_alt->new_len) {
+ /*
+ * The NOP case for _static_cpu_has()
+ */
+ if (special_alt->static_feat)
+ fake_jump->jump_dest->static_jump_dest = true;
+
*new_insn = fake_jump;
return 0;
}
@@ -664,6 +670,21 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
insn->sec, insn->offset);
return -1;
}
+
+ if (special_alt->static_feat) {
+ if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
+ WARN_FUNC("not an unconditional jump in _static_cpu_has()",
+ insn->sec, insn->offset);
+ }
+ if (insn->jump_dest == fake_jump) {
+ WARN_FUNC("jump inside alternative for _static_cpu_has()",
+ insn->sec, insn->offset);
+ }
+ /*
+ * The JMP+disp case for _static_cpu_has()
+ */
+ insn->jump_dest->static_jump_dest = true;
+ }
}
if (!last_new_insn) {
--- a/tools/objtool/special.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/special.c
@@ -40,6 +40,11 @@
#define ALT_FEATURE_OFFSET 8
#define ALT_ORIG_LEN_OFFSET 10
#define ALT_NEW_LEN_OFFSET 11
+#define ALT_PADDING_OFFSET 12
+#define ALT_TYPE_OFFSET 13
+
+#define ALT_TYPE_DEFAULT 0
+#define ALT_TYPE_STATIC_CPU_HAS 1
#define X86_FEATURE_POPCNT (4*32+23)
@@ -99,10 +104,13 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
if (entry->feature) {
unsigned short feature;
+ unsigned char type;
feature = *(unsigned short *)(sec->data->d_buf + offset +
entry->feature);
+ type = *(unsigned char *)(sec->data->d_buf + offset + ALT_TYPE_OFFSET);
+
/*
* It has been requested that we don't validate the !POPCNT
* feature path which is a "very very small percentage of
@@ -110,6 +118,9 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
*/
if (feature == X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
alt->skip_orig = true;
+
+ if (type == ALT_TYPE_STATIC_CPU_HAS)
+ alt->static_feat = true;
}
orig_rela = find_rela_by_dest(sec, offset + entry->orig);
--- a/tools/objtool/special.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/special.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct special_alt {
bool group;
bool skip_orig;
bool jump_or_nop;
+ bool static_feat;
struct section *orig_sec;
unsigned long orig_off;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] objtool validation of static branches and retpoline Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: Update _static_cpu_has to use all named variables Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 15:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86: Add a type field to alt_instr Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 22:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-16 22:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 23:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86: Annotate static_cpu_has alternative Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-16 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 14:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: Annotate dynamic jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] objtool: More complex static jump implementation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 3:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/10] objtool: Even more complex static block checks Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 3:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116143241.236771093@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox