public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: Annotate dynamic jump in head_64.S
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:28:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116143241.416586568@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20180116142825.376986833@infradead.org

[-- Attachment #1: peterz-objtool-retpoline-annotate.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 601 bytes --]

The objtool retpoline validation found this indirect jump. Seeing how
its on CPU bringup before we run userspace it should be safe, annotate
it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ ENTRY(secondary_startup_64)
 
 	/* Ensure I am executing from virtual addresses */
 	movq	$1f, %rax
-	jmp	*%rax
+2:	jmp	*%rax
+	.pushsection .discard.retpoline_safe
+	.quad 2b
+	.popsection
 1:
 	UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-16 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] objtool validation of static branches and retpoline Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: Update _static_cpu_has to use all named variables Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 11:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 15:24       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86: Add a type field to alt_instr Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 22:49   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-16 22:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 23:06       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 11:32   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86: Annotate static_cpu_has alternative Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:15   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 23:02   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17  9:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:27       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 14:30         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 16:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:33   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] objtool: More complex static jump implementation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17  3:05   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17  8:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/10] objtool: Even more complex static block checks Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17  3:12   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17  8:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:13       ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180116143241.416586568@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox