From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
<keescook@chromium.org>, <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
<indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/KASLR: Add parameter kaslr_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:32:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117123235.2276f2e7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117105351.12226-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:53:46 +0800
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> ***Background:
> People reported that kaslr may randomly chooses some positions
> which are located in movable memory regions. This will break memory
> hotplug feature.
>
> And also on kvm guest with 4GB meory, the good unfragmented 1GB could
> be occupied by randomized kernel. It will cause hugetlb failing to
> allocate 1GB page. While kernel with 'nokaslr' has not such issue.
> This causes regression. Please see the discussion mail:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/4/236
>
> ***Solutions:
> Introduce a new kernel parameter 'kaslr_mem=nn@ss' to let users to
> specify the memory regions where kernel can be allowed to randomize
> safely.
I've tested this series with a 4GB KVM guest. With kaslr_mem=1G, I
got one 1GB page allocated 100% of the time in 85 boots. Without
kaslr_mem=, I got 3 failures in only 10 boots (that is, in 3 boots
I had no 1GB page allocated).
So, this series solves the 1GB page problem for me.
>
> E.g if 'movable_node' is spedified, we can use 'kaslr_mem=nn@ss' to
> tell KASLR where we can put kernel safely. Then KASLR code can avoid
> those movable regions and only choose those immovable regions
> specified.
>
> For hugetlb case, users can always add 'kaslr_mem=1G' in kernel
> cmdline since the 0~1G is always fragmented region because of BIOS
> reserved area. Surely users can specify regions more precisely if
> they know system memory very well.
>
> *** Issues need be discussed
> There are several issues I am not quite sure, please help review and
> give suggestions:
>
> 1) Since there's already mem_avoid[] which stores the memory regions
> KASLR need avoid. For the regions KASLR can safely use, I name it as
> mem_usable[], not sure if it's appropriate. Or kaslr_mem[] directly?
>
> 2) In v6, I made 'kaslr_mem=' as a kernel parameter which users can use
> to specify memory regions where kenrel can be extracted safely by
> 'kaslr_mem=nn@ss', or regions where we need avoid to extract kernel by
> 'kaslr_mem=nn!ss'. While later I rethink about it, seems
> 'kaslr_mem=nn@ss' can satisfy the current requirement, there's no need
> to introduce the 'kaslr_mem=nn!ss'. So I just take that
> 'kaslr_mem=nn!ss' handling patch off, may add it later if anyone think
> it's necessary. Any suggestions?
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2698457.html
>
> ***Test results:
> - I did some tests for the memory hotplug issues. I specify the memory
> region in one node, then I found every time the kernel will be
> extracted to the memory of this node.
> - Luiz said he will do some tests for the 1G huge page issue.
>
> ***History
> v6->v7:
> - Drop the unnecessary avoid part for now.
> - Add document for the new parameter.
>
> v5->v6:
> - Add the last patch to save the avoid memory regions.
>
> v4->v5:
> - Change the problem reported by LKP
> Follow Dou's suggestion:
> - Also return if match "movable_node" when parsing kernel commandline
> in handle_mem_filter without define CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>
> v3->v4:
> Follow Kees's suggestion:
> - Put the functions variables of immovable_mem to #ifdef
> CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG and change some code place
> - Change the name of "process_mem_region" to "slots_count"
> - Reanme the new function "process_immovable_mem" to "process_mem_region"
> Follow Baoquan's suggestion:
> - Fail KASLR if "movable_node" specified without "immovable_mem"
> - Ajust the code place of handling mem_region directely if no
> immovable_mem specified
> Follow Randy's suggestion:
> - Change the mistake and add detailed description for the document.
>
> v2->v3:
> Follow Baoquan He's suggestion:
> - Change names of several functions.
> - Add a new parameter "immovable_mem" instead of extending mvoable_node
> - Use the clamp to calculate the memory intersecting, which makes
> logical more clear.
> - Disable memory mirror if movable_node specified
>
> v1->v2:
> Follow Dou Liyang's suggestion:
> - Add the parse for movable_node=nn[KMG] without @ss[KMG]
> - Fix the bug for more than one "movable_node=" specified
> - Drop useless variables and use mem_vector region directely
> - Add more comments.
>
> Chao Fan (5):
> x86/KASLR: Add kaslr_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
> x86/KASLR: Handle the memory regions specified in kaslr_mem
> x86/KASLR: Give a warning if movable_node specified without kaslr_mem=
> x86/KASLR: Skip memory mirror handling if movable_node specified
> document: add document for kaslr_mem
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 10 ++
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 10:53 [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/KASLR: Add parameter kaslr_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG] Chao Fan
2018-01-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] x86/KASLR: Add kaslr_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG] Chao Fan
2018-01-19 2:34 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] x86/KASLR: Handle the memory regions specified in kaslr_mem Chao Fan
2018-01-19 2:39 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] x86/KASLR: Give a warning if movable_node specified without kaslr_mem= Chao Fan
2018-01-17 14:02 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-18 1:20 ` Chao Fan
2018-01-17 14:04 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-19 3:31 ` [PATCH v8 " Chao Fan
2018-01-19 3:48 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] x86/KASLR: Skip memory mirror handling if movable_node specified Chao Fan
2018-01-17 14:03 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-18 1:13 ` Chao Fan
2018-01-19 3:33 ` [PATCH v8 " Chao Fan
2018-01-19 3:47 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-17 10:53 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] document: add document for kaslr_mem Chao Fan
2018-01-19 3:00 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-19 3:36 ` [PATCH v8 " Chao Fan
2018-01-19 3:53 ` Baoquan He
2018-01-19 5:27 ` Chao Fan
2018-01-19 5:23 ` [RESEND PATCH " Chao Fan
2018-01-19 18:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2018-01-17 17:32 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2018-01-18 1:11 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] x86/KASLR: Add parameter kaslr_mem=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG] Chao Fan
2018-01-18 13:39 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117123235.2276f2e7@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox