From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Use wrapper for lockdep asserts
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:00:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118020025.GA9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118004143.GA376@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:41:43PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:29:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 06:24:30AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> > >
> > > Commits c0b334c5bfa9 and ea9b0c8a26a2 introduced new sparse warnings
> > > by accessing rcu_node->lock directly and ignoring the __private
> > > marker. Introduce a new wrapper and use it. Also fix a similar problem
> > > in srcutree.c introduced by a3883df3935e.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> >
> > Good catch! Applied for review and testing.
> >
> > For some reason, I was expecting 0day to catch this sort of thing...
>
> Funny you should say, it was 0day which pointed it out to me! I changed
> lockdep to take a const struct lockdep_map *lock instead of a plain
> struct lockdep_map *lock and I got a whinge from 0day that I'd changed
> some of the warnings, so I looked into it in case it was my fault.
Nary a peep at me. Regardless, glad you caught it, and thank you for
the fix!
Thanx, Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 14:24 [PATCH] rcu: Use wrapper for lockdep asserts Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-17 23:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-18 0:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-01-18 2:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180118020025.GA9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox