From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, maxg@mellanox.com,
james.smart@broadcom.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 01:42:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119084218.GF12043@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0639aa2f-d153-5aac-ce08-df0d4b45f9a0@oracle.com>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 04:14:02PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> On 01/19/2018 04:01 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The nvme_dev_disable routine makes forward progress without depending on
> > timeout handling to complete expired commands. Once controller disabling
> > completes, there can't possibly be any started requests that can expire.
> > So we don't need nvme_timeout to do anything for requests above the
> > boundary.
> >
> Yes, once controller disabling completes, any started requests will be handled and cannot expire.
> But before the _boundary_, there could be a nvme_timeout context runs with nvme_dev_disable in parallel.
> If a timeout path grabs a request, then nvme_dev_disable cannot get and cancel it.
> So even though the nvme_dev_disable completes, there still could be a request in nvme_timeout context.
>
> The worst case is :
> nvme_timeout nvme_reset_work
> if (ctrl->state == RESETTING ) nvme_dev_disable
> nvme_dev_disable initializing procedure
>
> the nvme_dev_disable run with reinit procedure in nvme_reset_work in parallel.
Okay, I see what you're saying. That's a pretty obscure case, as normally
we enter nvme_reset_work with the queues already disabled, but there
are a few cases where we need nvme_reset_work to handle that.
But if we are in that case, I think we really just want to sync the
queues. What do you think of this?
---
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index fde6fd2e7eef..516383193416 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3520,6 +3520,17 @@ void nvme_stop_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_stop_queues);
+void nvme_sync_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ struct nvme_ns *ns;
+
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
+ list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
+ blk_sync_queue(ns->queue);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_sync_queues);
+
void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
{
struct nvme_ns *ns;
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index 8e7fc1b041b7..45b1b8ceddb6 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ void nvme_complete_async_event(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, __le16 status,
void nvme_stop_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
+void nvme_sync_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
void nvme_kill_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
void nvme_unfreeze(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
void nvme_wait_freeze(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index a2ffb557b616..1fe00be22ad1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -2289,8 +2289,10 @@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
* If we're called to reset a live controller first shut it down before
* moving on.
*/
- if (dev->ctrl.ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE)
+ if (dev->ctrl.ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE) {
nvme_dev_disable(dev, false);
+ nvme_sync_queues(&dev->ctrl);
+ }
result = nvme_pci_enable(dev);
if (result)
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-18 10:10 [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 1/2] nvme-pci: introduce RECONNECTING state to mark initializing procedure Jianchao Wang
2018-01-18 10:17 ` Max Gurtovoy
2018-01-19 9:49 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:23 ` James Smart
2018-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH V5 2/2] nvme-pci: fixup the timeout case when reset is ongoing Jianchao Wang
2018-01-19 4:59 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 5:55 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 6:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 6:53 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-18 15:34 ` [PATCH V5 0/2] nvme-pci: fix " James Smart
2018-01-19 8:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 8:14 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 8:42 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-01-19 9:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-19 11:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-19 13:56 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 2:11 ` Keith Busch
2018-01-20 14:07 ` jianchao.wang
2018-01-20 14:14 ` jianchao.wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180119084218.GF12043@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox