public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:11:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119151150.GB9033@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b541ff4d-8131-ac09-1dbe-f549ceb47c6f@amd.com>

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:03:52AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/15/2018 4:47 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
> > On 11.01.2018 19:33, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 01:25:45PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> >>> This patch series addresses an issue when SME is active and the BSP
> >>> is attempting to check for and load microcode during load_ucode_bsp().
> >>> Since the initrd has not been decrypted (yet) and the virtual address
> >>> of the initrd treats the memory as encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing
> >>> fails to locate the microcode.
> >>>
> >>> This series moves the encryption of the initrd into the early boot code
> >>> and encrypts it at the same time that the kernel is encrypted.  Since
> >>> the initrd is now encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing succeeds in
> >>> properly locating the microcode.
> >>>
> >>> The following patches are included in this fix:
> >>> - Cleanup register saving in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S
> >>> - Reduce parameters and complexity for creating the SME PGD mappings
> >>> - Centralize the use of the PMD flags used in sme_encrypt_kernel() in
> >>>    preparation for using PTE flags also.
> >>> - Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() to handle PAGE aligned encryption, not
> >>>    just 2MB large page aligned encryption.
> >>> - Encrypt the initrd in sme_encrypt_kernel() when the kernel is being
> >>>    encrypted.
> >>>
> >>> This patch series is based on tip/master.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes from v2:
> >>> - General code cleanup based on feedback.
> >>>
> >>> Changes from v1:
> >>> - Additional patch to cleanup the register saving performed in
> >>>    arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S in prep for changes made in the
> >>>    remainder of the patchset.
> >>> - Additional patch to reduce parameters and complexity for creating the
> >>>    SME PGD mappings by introducing and using a structure for referencing
> >>>    the PGD to populate, the pagetable allocation area, the
> >>> virtual/physical
> >>>    addresses being mapped and the pagetable flags to be used.
> >>> - Consolidate PMD/PTE mapping code to reduce duplication.
> >>>
> >>> Tom Lendacky (5):
> >>>        x86/mm: Cleanup register saving in mem_encrypt_boot.S
> >>>        x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping
> >>>        x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel()
> >>>        x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption
> >>>        x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h |    4
> >>>   arch/x86/kernel/head64.c           |    4
> >>>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c            |   10 -
> >>>   arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c          |  356
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>   arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S     |   80 ++++----
> >>>   5 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> All 5:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> >>
> > 
> > Guys , are these patches going to be part of 4.15 ?
> > 
> > With mem_encrypt=on without these patches microcode loading doesn't
> > work right. Also @stable 4.14 would need the fixes too.
> 
> It looks like these patches have been pulled into 4.15.  I did forget
> to cc stable, so I'll follow-up with a separate email to have these
> back-ported to the 4.14 stable tree.

What are the git commit ids?   That's all I need :)

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10 19:25 [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/mm: Cleanup register saving in mem_encrypt_boot.S Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16  3:38   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Clean up register saving in the __enc_copy() assembly code tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16  3:38   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel() Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16  3:39   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16  3:39   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16  3:40   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix Gabriel C
2018-01-10 21:26   ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 22:20     ` Gabriel C
2018-01-11 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-15 22:47   ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 15:03     ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:11       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-01-19 15:27         ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:35           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:38             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:56             ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 16:02               ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 17:15                 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:39           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119151150.GB9033@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nix.or.die@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox