From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:35:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119153524.GB1214@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47ab23e7-c3e8-0edd-a7ac-019bd0e47a02@amd.com>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:27:47AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 1/19/2018 9:11 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:03:52AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> >> On 1/15/2018 4:47 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
> >>> On 11.01.2018 19:33, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 01:25:45PM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> >>>>> This patch series addresses an issue when SME is active and the BSP
> >>>>> is attempting to check for and load microcode during load_ucode_bsp().
> >>>>> Since the initrd has not been decrypted (yet) and the virtual address
> >>>>> of the initrd treats the memory as encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing
> >>>>> fails to locate the microcode.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This series moves the encryption of the initrd into the early boot code
> >>>>> and encrypts it at the same time that the kernel is encrypted. Since
> >>>>> the initrd is now encrypted, the CPIO archive parsing succeeds in
> >>>>> properly locating the microcode.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The following patches are included in this fix:
> >>>>> - Cleanup register saving in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S
> >>>>> - Reduce parameters and complexity for creating the SME PGD mappings
> >>>>> - Centralize the use of the PMD flags used in sme_encrypt_kernel() in
> >>>>> preparation for using PTE flags also.
> >>>>> - Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() to handle PAGE aligned encryption, not
> >>>>> just 2MB large page aligned encryption.
> >>>>> - Encrypt the initrd in sme_encrypt_kernel() when the kernel is being
> >>>>> encrypted.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch series is based on tip/master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes from v2:
> >>>>> - General code cleanup based on feedback.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes from v1:
> >>>>> - Additional patch to cleanup the register saving performed in
> >>>>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S in prep for changes made in the
> >>>>> remainder of the patchset.
> >>>>> - Additional patch to reduce parameters and complexity for creating the
> >>>>> SME PGD mappings by introducing and using a structure for referencing
> >>>>> the PGD to populate, the pagetable allocation area, the
> >>>>> virtual/physical
> >>>>> addresses being mapped and the pagetable flags to be used.
> >>>>> - Consolidate PMD/PTE mapping code to reduce duplication.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tom Lendacky (5):
> >>>>> x86/mm: Cleanup register saving in mem_encrypt_boot.S
> >>>>> x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping
> >>>>> x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel()
> >>>>> x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption
> >>>>> x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 4
> >>>>> arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 4
> >>>>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 10 -
> >>>>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 356
> >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >>>>> arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt_boot.S | 80 ++++----
> >>>>> 5 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> All 5:
> >>>>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Guys , are these patches going to be part of 4.15 ?
> >>>
> >>> With mem_encrypt=on without these patches microcode loading doesn't
> >>> work right. Also @stable 4.14 would need the fixes too.
> >>
> >> It looks like these patches have been pulled into 4.15. I did forget
> >> to cc stable, so I'll follow-up with a separate email to have these
> >> back-ported to the 4.14 stable tree.
> >
> > What are the git commit ids? That's all I need :)
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Here are the commit ids:
> 1303880179e6 (“x86/mm: Clean up register saving in the __enc_copy() assembly code”)
> bacf6b499e11 (“x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping”)
> 2b5d00b6c2cd (“x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel()”)
> cc5f01e28d6c (“x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption”)
> 107cd2532181 (“x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update”)
>
> The last commit won't apply cleanly on 4.14. There was a change in
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c for SEV support. The actual patch to that file
> is very small it just removes the call to sme_early_encrypt() and the
> associated comment. I can submit a new version of that patch if you
> want, just let me know.
A backported version of that would be great, thanks.
And are any of these needed in older kernels like 4.4 and 4.9?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 19:25 [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/mm: Cleanup register saving in mem_encrypt_boot.S Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:38 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Clean up register saving in the __enc_copy() assembly code tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] x86/mm: Use a struct to reduce parameters for SME PGD mapping Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:38 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] x86/mm: Centralize PMD flags in sme_encrypt_kernel() Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mm: Prepare sme_encrypt_kernel() for PAGE aligned encryption Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:39 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 19:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] x86/mm: Encrypt the initrd earlier for BSP microcode update Tom Lendacky
2018-01-16 3:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 21:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] x86: SME: BSP/SME microcode update fix Gabriel C
2018-01-10 21:26 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-10 22:20 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-11 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-15 22:47 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 15:03 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:27 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-01-19 15:38 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-19 15:56 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 16:02 ` Gabriel C
2018-01-19 17:15 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-19 15:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180119153524.GB1214@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nix.or.die@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox