public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: Allow fine-grained PMU access control
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:45:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119164540.GT2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118184007.1300-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 06:40:07PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> 
> For situations where sysadmins might want to allow different level of
> of access control for different PMUs, we start creating per-PMU
> perf_event_paranoid controls in sysfs.

You've completely and utterly failed to explain why.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 18:40 [RFC] perf: Allow fine-grained PMU access control Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-01-19 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-19 17:10   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-23 15:58     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-21  9:25 Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-22  9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-22  9:29   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-22 12:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-22 13:01       ` Alexey Budankov
2018-05-22 17:19         ` Andi Kleen
2018-06-11  8:08           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-06-18  8:06             ` Alexey Budankov
2018-05-22 16:15       ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119164540.GT2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox