Re: [PATCH] perf report: Provide libtraceevent with a kernel symbol resolver

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:25:03AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 07:57:59PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:22:30PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:43:18AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:48:12AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:06:11AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:47:32PM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > > > > > > So that beautifiers wanting to resolve kernel function addresses to
> > > > > > > names can do its work, and when we use "perf report" for output of
> > > > > > > "perf kmem record", we will get kernel symbol output.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >  tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > > > > > > index dd4df9a..7b65100 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> > > > > > > @@ -1317,6 +1317,15 @@ int cmd_report(int argc, const char **argv)
> > > > > > >  		report.range_num = 1;
> > > > > > >  	}
> > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > +	if (session->tevent.pevent &&
> > > > > > > +	    pevent_set_function_resolver(session->tevent.pevent,
> > > > > > > +					 machine__resolve_kernel_addr,
> > > > > > > +					 &session->machines.host) < 0) {
> > > > > > > +		pr_err("%s: failed to set libtraceevent function resolver\n",
> > > > > > > +		       __func__);
> > > > > > > +		return -1;
> > > > > > > +	}
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > why not calling the wrapper trace_event__register_resolver?
> > > > > The reason is the same as builtin-script doesn't use trace_event__register_resolver,
> > > > > because we only use report and script to analyze offline perf.data, and there could
> > > > > be no tracepoints in perf.data.
> > > > 
> > > > hum, I missed this functionality.. so we need this even if there
> > > > are no tracepoints in the perf.data?
> > > 
> > > In "perf report", when there are tracepoints in perf.data, session->tevent.pevent
> > > will be initialized in trace-event-read.c:trace_report, then "if (session->tevent.pevent"
> > > will become true, and we should calling pevent_set_function_resolver.
> > > 
> > > But if we calling trace_event__register_resolver, then it will initialize tevent.pevent
> > > no matter whether there are tracepoints in perf.data.
> > 
> > ok, should we call it from perf_session__read_header then?
> > below perf_evlist__prepare_tracepoint_events perhaps
> 
> No, I think we can't do it in perf_session__read_header,
> because perf_session__new calls perf_session__create_kernel_maps
> to initialize machines.host after calling perf_session__open, and
> pevent_set_function_resolver needs it. 
> 
> Although it is possible to place pevent_set_function_resolver at
> the tail of perf_session__new, but I don't think it is a better
> choice for us, because tools like "perf kmem stat" doesn't need it,
> "perf kmem stat" has itself way to prepare and display the symbols
> of callsites.
> 
> I think the current calling place of pevent_set_function_resolver
> for "perf report" is the right place.

ok

jirka