From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
jolsa@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf util: Use target->per_thread and target->system_wide flags
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180123144033.GA24739@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06929c28-6431-29f2-340e-6dbc2302c78b@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 07:02:44AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
SNIP
> > > threads = thread_map__new_str(target->pid, target->tid, target->uid,
> > > - target->per_thread);
> > > + target->per_thread && target->system_wide);
> >
> > At first glance I thought your solution would do the trick but perf
> > record does use target->system_wide when the '-a' switch is used.
> > Moreover specifying the '-a' switch doesn't prevent the '--per-thread'
> > option from being used as well, making both target->perf_thread and
> > target_system_wide equal to true (and that is not good).
> >
> > Although not a fan of adding more to struct target, the advantage of
> > having target->all_threads is that we are guaranteed that it isn't
> > used anywhere else.
> >
> > Let me know what you think,
> > Mathieu
> >
>
> If we specify both '-a' and '--per-thread' to perf record, perf record will
> override'--per-thread'. So now target->per_thread = false, and
> target->system_wide = true.
>
> If we specify '--per-thread' only to perf record, target->per_thread = true,
> and target->system_wide = false.
>
> So whatever for any case, target->per_thread && target->system_wide is
> false.
>
> Since the parameter is false, in thread_map__new_str(), it will not execute
> the thread_map__new_all_cpus(). So that will not change perf record previous
> behavior.
>
> In perf stat, it allows the case that target->per_thread and
> target->system_wide are all true. That means we want to collect system-wide
> per-thread metrics.
could you please put this description into comment
before the thread_map__new_str is called?
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-23 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-22 22:15 [PATCH] perf util: Use target->per_thread and target->system_wide flags Jin Yao
2018-01-22 21:10 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-22 23:02 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-22 23:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-23 14:40 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-01-24 0:12 ` Jin, Yao
2018-01-22 23:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-23 1:08 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180123144033.GA24739@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox