From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227cdNdPGt8bSmLWZqtCW2uSb9eUnXU1JR3/Sh/RB1A9sg2ZsAjZl1/RCYhpzPQhiN0KEPFc ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1516715997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GUs+6mipM5LB+DYVIdlWUPZ2L0OGvV2IwImg9kT6NjiHhU9oIUA2BrM+0dx9Bfb+/0 9Ow8+M5BNjZ1MOfLI6k3wIsk6XreDcqFWOJf/7tPZVtAe+Rga8FmLdBm2BwoZxP47No3 v34UQCy3XueHot5ubajNeW2juaktiQpJLL+A+/eSt1k+drerVl+5I9AJ1lfopgsblh72 TUdPmFizm6Dxb9bPeP2t2PTEHfOQwdEn3Sz8bKLVE/rID+WFEEbg8Sls5QxzN4/JYlBA AVpZ5z754P2bjWNYtfkpI5orDxnBDHH1SASOlCgiinXu6gqmKdg+CgWCE3E9HbDD9tFp Hx3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:organization:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=RH3UtaLhCVEuikZ/hqChAAPrdJuRYCTiCiicWYgyZRk=; b=O5hvuOgJuZOBQLmTq5PDM2EdmVJ4lUMMwf00Dfp+3BPtGGsyL1PDR/1siRRHNn8hV+ 3IsQkm3h5nz2UiAWNm6FJqA1v4/698bI1Kgkn0U5m+7ixyrDgYsYvLd5MQyHqV3JGP6V SfvsHS1XyXHevUpJbJQTe8/uv5GHl7HLjiN3rgkkdoYbAOAEtXn5SBXCLfDVUB9RphNW TUU32HY8gH/JKwLjQm/yCuUk3Z/nA84GUuUR/sUWCrQX9rZvrUp2GVBGZa5ValpxHnJr G+2Q23oLc0qxyAMRAG6aEWm+SOSKGc2+RsiGzQXXDqLzWmbv6buQx0dV5cD9zmC1pmFo ECfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cohuck@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cohuck@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:59:47 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini , David Hildenbrand , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jon Masters , Marcus Meissner , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask Message-ID: <20180123145947.72bb1cd2.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1516712825-2917-3-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> References: <1516712825-2917-1-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> <1516712825-2917-3-git-send-email-schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1590388681609659115?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1590391993391247531?= X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:07:02 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > To be able to switch off specific CPU alternatives with kernel parameters > make a copy of the facility bit mask provided by STFLE and use the copy > for the decision to apply an alternative. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/facility.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > arch/s390/include/asm/lowcore.h | 3 ++- > arch/s390/kernel/alternative.c | 3 ++- > arch/s390/kernel/early.c | 3 +++ > arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 4 +++- > arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 4 +++- > 6 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) You have dropped various r-bs (including mine). Has this patch been changed? (Doesn't look like it.)