From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@fb.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Avoid triggering hardlockup from debug_show_all_locks()
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:11:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180123211154.GI1771050@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180123160054.325ff326@gandalf.local.home>
Hello, Steven.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 04:00:54PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:57:06 -0800
> Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, it's ridiculous how often printk ends up escalating otherwise
> > recoverable situations into system crashes. I don't know what the
> > right answer is. For spurious NMI hardlockups, maybe auditing debug
> > paths and adding touch_nmi_watchdog() would be enough but that also is
> > a pretty leaky approach.
>
> What about if every printk were to touch NMI watchdog?
>
> NMI watchdog is really there for when the system locks up. If the
> system is locked up doing printk, at least we see what is happening,
> and not a total freeze.
Yeah, that would definitely be a solution. The downside is that when
the system completely locks up from printk storm while holding
critical locks (say, tasklist_lock), the watchdog won't be able to
reset the system. I guess the judgement would depend on what one
expects of the NMI watchdog, but I personally would be happier with
printk touching NMI automatically.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-23 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-22 22:00 [PATCH] lockdep: Avoid triggering hardlockup from debug_show_all_locks() Tejun Heo
2018-01-23 19:03 ` Rik van Riel
2018-01-23 20:57 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-23 21:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-23 21:11 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-24 2:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-24 2:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-24 5:00 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-24 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-24 10:38 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/lockdep: " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180123211154.GI1771050@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=riel@fb.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox