From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: lianglihao@huawei.com
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, guohanjun@huawei.com,
heng.z@huawei.com, hb.chen@huawei.com, lihao.liang@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 12:26:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124112629.GA2339@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516694381-20333-2-git-send-email-lianglihao@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 03:59:26PM +0800, lianglihao@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Heng Zhang <heng.z@huawei.com>
>
> This RCU implementation (PRCU) is based on a fast consensus protocol
> published in the following paper:
>
> Fast Consensus Using Bounded Staleness for Scalable Read-mostly Synchronization.
> Haibo Chen, Heng Zhang, Ran Liu, Binyu Zang, and Haibing Guan.
> IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS), 2016.
> https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3024114.3024143
That's an utterly useless changelog for something like a new RCU
implementation.
You fail to describe why you're proposing a new RCU implementation; what
problems does it fix?, how is it better?
All you provide is a paywalled link to some paper that we can't read.
Please write a real changelog that describes things properly and
provide, if at all possible, a readily accessible link to your paper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-23 7:59 [PATCH RFC 00/16] A new RCU implementation based on a fast consensus protocol lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 01/16] prcu: Add PRCU implementation lianglihao
2018-01-24 11:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-24 17:15 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-24 20:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-25 6:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-25 7:30 ` Boqun Feng
2018-01-30 5:34 ` zhangheng (AC)
2018-01-30 6:40 ` Boqun Feng
2018-01-30 10:42 ` zhangheng (AC)
2018-01-27 7:35 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-30 3:58 ` zhangheng (AC)
2018-01-29 9:10 ` Lai Jiangshan
2018-01-30 6:21 ` zhangheng (AC)
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 02/16] rcutorture: Add PRCU rcu_torture_ops lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 03/16] rcutorture: Add PRCU test config files lianglihao
2018-01-25 6:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 04/16] rcuperf: Add PRCU rcu_perf_ops lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 05/16] rcuperf: Add PRCU test config files lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 06/16] rcuperf: Set gp_exp to true for tests to run lianglihao
2018-01-25 6:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-26 8:33 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 07/16] prcu: Implement call_prcu() API lianglihao
2018-01-25 6:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-26 8:44 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-26 22:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 08/16] prcu: Implement PRCU callback processing lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 09/16] prcu: Implement prcu_barrier() API lianglihao
2018-01-25 6:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 10/16] rcutorture: Test call_prcu() and prcu_barrier() lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 11/16] rcutorture: Add basic ARM64 support to run scripts lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 12/16] prcu: Add PRCU Kconfig parameter lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 13/16] prcu: Comment source code lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 14/16] rcuperf: Add config files with various CONFIG_NR_CPUS lianglihao
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 15/16] rcutorture: Add scripts to run experiments lianglihao
2018-01-25 6:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-23 7:59 ` [PATCH RFC 16/16] Add GPLv2 license lianglihao
2018-01-25 5:53 ` [PATCH RFC 00/16] A new RCU implementation based on a fast consensus protocol Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-27 7:22 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-27 7:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-27 9:57 ` Lihao Liang
2018-01-27 23:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-27 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124112629.GA2339@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hb.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=heng.z@huawei.com \
--cc=lianglihao@huawei.com \
--cc=lihao.liang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox