public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ata: pata_pdc2027x: Replace mdelay with msleep
@ 2018-01-25 10:45 Jia-Ju Bai
  2018-01-25 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jia-Ju Bai @ 2018-01-25 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: b.zolnierkie, tj; +Cc: linux-ide, linux-kernel, Jia-Ju Bai

After checking all possible call chains to pdc_adjust_pll and
pdc_detect_pll_input_clock,
my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context,
namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
And their caller functions pdc2027x_init_one and pdc2027x_reinit_one 
calls pci_enable_device which can sleep, and no spinlock is held when
calling pdc_adjust_pll and pdc_detect_pll_input_clock,
so it proves that pdc_adjust_pll and pdc_detect_pll_input_clock 
can call functions which can sleep.
Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c
index ffd8d33..4e8584d 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void pdc_adjust_pll(struct ata_host *host, long pll_clock, unsigned int b
 	ioread16(mmio_base + PDC_PLL_CTL); /* flush */
 
 	/* Wait the PLL circuit to be stable */
-	mdelay(30);
+	msleep(30);
 
 #ifdef PDC_DEBUG
 	/*
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static long pdc_detect_pll_input_clock(struct ata_host *host)
 	start_time = ktime_get();
 
 	/* Let the counter run for 100 ms. */
-	mdelay(100);
+	msleep(100);
 
 	/* Read the counter values again */
 	end_count = pdc_read_counter(host);
-- 
1.7.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_pdc2027x: Replace mdelay with msleep
  2018-01-25 10:45 [PATCH] ata: pata_pdc2027x: Replace mdelay with msleep Jia-Ju Bai
@ 2018-01-25 15:30 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2018-01-25 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jia-Ju Bai; +Cc: b.zolnierkie, linux-ide, linux-kernel

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 06:45:05PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> After checking all possible call chains to pdc_adjust_pll and
> pdc_detect_pll_input_clock,
> my tool finds that these functions are never called in atomic context,
> namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock.
> And their caller functions pdc2027x_init_one and pdc2027x_reinit_one 
> calls pci_enable_device which can sleep, and no spinlock is held when
> calling pdc_adjust_pll and pdc_detect_pll_input_clock,
> so it proves that pdc_adjust_pll and pdc_detect_pll_input_clock 
> can call functions which can sleep.
> Thus mdelay can be replaced with msleep to avoid busy wait.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>

Applied to libata/for-4.16.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-25 15:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-25 10:45 [PATCH] ata: pata_pdc2027x: Replace mdelay with msleep Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-25 15:30 ` Tejun Heo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox