Re: [PATCH] staging: ashmem: Fix lockdep issue during llseek

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-02-16T16:32:58Z

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 05:01:25PM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> ashmem_mutex create a chain of dependencies like so:
>
> (1)
> mmap syscall ->
> mmap_sem -> (acquired)
> ashmem_mmap
> ashmem_mutex (try to acquire)
> (block)
>
> (2)
> llseek syscall ->
> ashmem_llseek ->
> ashmem_mutex -> (acquired)
> inode_lock ->
> inode->i_rwsem (try to acquire)
> (block)
>
> (3)
> getdents ->
> iterate_dir ->
> inode_lock ->
> inode->i_rwsem (acquired)
> copy_to_user ->
> mmap_sem (try to acquire)
>
> There is a lock ordering created between mmap_sem and inode->i_rwsem
> causing a lockdep splat [2] during a syzcaller test, this patch fixes
> the issue by unlocking the mutex earlier. Functionally that's Ok since
> we don't need to protect vfs_llseek.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10185031/
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/10/48
>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: Arve Hjonnevag <arve@android.com>
> Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: syzbot+8ec30bb7bf1a981a2012@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Please always properly version your patches, and put what changed below
the --- line, so I have a hint as to which patch to apply.
Documentation/SubmittingPatches has the full details of how to do this.

Can you resend me the "latest" version of this patch, so I have a chance
of getting it right? :)

thanks,

greg k-h