From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
vkuznets@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm: disable fast MMIO when running nested
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 04:49:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180126044919-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdc694c8-ee13-f7aa-a551-59380388518e@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:41:58AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年01月26日 01:11, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 09:49:22AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > > Michael and Jason, any progress on implementing a fast virtio mechanism
> > > > > that doesn't rely on undefined behavior?
> > > > >
> > > > > (Encode writing instruction length into last 4 bits of MMIO address,
> > > > > side-channel say that accesses to the MMIO area always use certain
> > > > > instruction length, use hypercall, ...)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > No progress from my side. But we can use PIO for virtio 1.0 and it's
> > > > faster than fast MMIO (qemu supports modern pio notification bar, we can
> > > > make it as default). It looks to me that neither encoding nor hypercall
> > > > will work for real hardware virtio device.
> > > Encoding the instruction length would work, the h/w virtio devices would
> > > just ignore it. But... it is really ugly.
> > >
> > > Using PIO would be a small step backwards for PCIe. As long as the device
> > > only needs *one* notification register (either MMIO or PIO) to initialize
> > > successfully, it's okay. Then if there is no PIO space you'd just fall back
> > > to the slower MMIO notification.
> > >
> > > Paolo
> > A bigger issue for PIO is it's causing exits for hw devices.
> >
> >
>
> Just to make sure I understand. For exits you mean vmexit? I believe MMIO
> will cause vmexit too.
>
> Thanks
Not with an assigned device where the PTE is marked as present, it
won't.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 9:55 [PATCH] x86/kvm: disable fast MMIO when running nested Liran Alon
2018-01-25 14:16 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-25 14:39 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-25 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-25 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 2:41 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 2:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-01-26 3:21 ` Jason Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-24 15:12 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-01-25 7:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2018-01-25 14:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-25 14:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-25 14:49 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180126044919-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox