public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: 3chas3@gmail.com, linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm: firestream: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in fs_send
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:05:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180126120522.GX13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516953627-30983-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 04:00:27PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> After checking all possible call chains to fs_send() here,
> my tool finds that fs_send() is never called in atomic context.
> And this function is assigned to a function pointer "dev->ops->send",
> which is only called by vcc_sendmsg() (net/atm/common.c)
> through vcc->dev->ops->send(), and vcc_sendmsg() calls schedule(),
> it indicates that fs_send() can call functions which may sleep.
> Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.

The trouble is, places like
net/atm/raw.c:65:       vcc->send = atm_send_aal0;
net/atm/raw.c:74:       vcc->send = vcc->dev->ops->send;
net/atm/raw.c:83:       vcc->send = vcc->dev->ops->send;
mean extra call chains.  It's *not* just vcc_sendmsg(), and e.g.
        ret = ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc->send(ATM_SKB(skb)->vcc, skb)
            ? DROP_PACKET : 1;
        bh_unlock_sock(sk_atm(vcc));
in pppoatm_send() definitely is called under a spinlock.

Looking through the driver (in advanced bitrot, as usual for drivers/atm),
I'd say that submit_queue() is fucked in head in the "queue full" case.
And judging by the history, had been thus since the original merge...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26  8:00 [PATCH] atm: firestream: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in fs_send Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-26 12:05 ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-01-26 13:56   ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-26 14:17     ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-26 16:10       ` David Miller
2018-01-26 16:10     ` David Miller
2018-01-26 16:07   ` David Miller
2018-01-26 16:17     ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-26 17:08     ` Al Viro
2018-01-27  4:09       ` Jia-Ju Bai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180126120522.GX13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=3chas3@gmail.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox