public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, pjt@google.com, jikos@kernel.org,
	gregkh@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	riel@redhat.com, luto@amacapital.net,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	keescook@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/retpoline: Simplify vmexit_fill_RSB()
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 18:13:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180129171319.GG2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126200725.rueqb2m6b4w47eu3@pd.tnic>

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:07:25PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> +.macro FILL_RETURN_BUFFER nr:req ftr:req
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
> +	ALTERNATIVE "", "call __clear_rsb", \ftr
>  #endif
>  .endm
>  
> @@ -206,15 +174,10 @@ extern char __indirect_thunk_end[];
>  static inline void vmexit_fill_RSB(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
> +	alternative_input("",
> +			  "call __fill_rsb",
> +			  X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE,
> +			  ASM_NO_INPUT_CLOBBER("memory"));
>  #endif
>  }
>  


> @@ -19,6 +20,37 @@ ENDPROC(__x86_indirect_thunk_\reg)
>  .endm
>  
>  /*
> + * Google experimented with loop-unrolling and this turned out to be
> + * the optimal version — two calls, each with their own speculation
> + * trap should their return address end up getting used, in a loop.
> + */
> +.macro BOINK_RSB nr:req sp:req
> +	push %_ASM_AX
> +	mov	$(\nr / 2), %_ASM_AX
> +	.align 16
> +771:
> +	call	772f
> +773:						/* speculation trap */
> +	pause
> +	lfence
> +	jmp	773b
> +	.align 16
> +772:
> +	call	774f
> +775:						/* speculation trap */
> +	pause
> +	lfence
> +	jmp	775b
> +	.align 16
> +774:
> +	dec	%_ASM_AX
> +	jnz	771b
> +	add	$((BITS_PER_LONG/8) * \nr), \sp
> +	pop %_ASM_AX
> +.endm
> +
> +
> +/*
>   * Despite being an assembler file we can't just use .irp here
>   * because __KSYM_DEPS__ only uses the C preprocessor and would
>   * only see one instance of "__x86_indirect_thunk_\reg" rather
> @@ -46,3 +78,15 @@ GENERATE_THUNK(r13)
>  GENERATE_THUNK(r14)
>  GENERATE_THUNK(r15)
>  #endif
> +
> +ENTRY(__fill_rsb)
> +	BOINK_RSB RSB_FILL_LOOPS, %_ASM_SP
> +	ret
> +END(__fill_rsb)
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fill_rsb)
> +
> +ENTRY(__clear_rsb)
> +	BOINK_RSB RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, %_ASM_SP
> +	ret
> +END(__clear_rsb)
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clear_rsb)


One thing I feel this ought to mention (in the Changelog probably) is
that it looses one RET for SKL+. That is, where we used to have 16
'safe' RETs before this, we now have 15.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-29 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26 12:11 [PATCH 0/4] x86: Some cleanups Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/alternative: Print unadorned pointers Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 15:02   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/nospec: Fix header guards names Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 15:03   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/retpoline: Simplify vmexit_fill_RSB() Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 12:33   ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 13:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 16:24       ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 16:47         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 20:06           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 20:07             ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Borislav Petkov
2018-01-27  4:20               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-27  9:01                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-27 14:04                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-29 17:13               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-26 20:08             ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/speculation: Simplify indirect_branch_prediction_barrier() Borislav Petkov
2018-01-27 12:32               ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-27 13:21                 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-06 19:44               ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 23:25                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-06 23:31                   ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 23:49                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-26 12:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/bugs: Drop one "mitigation" from dmesg Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 13:35   ` Greg KH
2018-01-26 15:03   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180129171319.GG2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox