public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:56:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130065653.gsp7blb3jttd6e6t@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hmkJyFgCBCXR8A1ykzk1tsxX-Lg4qgimhGxne=iG1Hzg@mail.gmail.com>


* Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> > The flip side is that if the MFENCE stalls the STAC that is ahead of it could be
> > processed for 'free' - while it's always post barrier with my suggestion.
> 
> This 'for free' aspect is what I aiming for.

Ok.

> >
> > But in any case it would be nice to see a discussion of this aspect in the
> > changelog, even if the patch does not change.
> 
> I'll add a note to the changelog that having the fence after the
> 'stac' hopefully allows some overlap of the cost of 'stac' and the
> flushing of the instruction pipeline.

Perfect!

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-30  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <151703971300.26578.1185595719337719486.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-27 19:26 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] spectre variant1 mitigations for tip/x86/pti Dan Williams
     [not found] ` <151703972396.26578.7326612698912543866.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  8:55   ` [PATCH v5 02/12] array_idx: sanitize speculative array de-references Ingo Molnar
2018-01-28 11:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-28 16:28     ` Dan Williams
2018-01-28 18:33       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-29 16:45         ` Dan Williams
2018-01-28 18:36       ` [kernel-hardening] " Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-30  6:29         ` Dan Williams
2018-01-30 19:38           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-30 20:13             ` Dan Williams
2018-01-30 20:27               ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-31  8:03                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-31 14:13                   ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-31 14:21                     ` Greg KH
     [not found] ` <151703972912.26578.6792656143278523491.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  9:02   ` [PATCH v5 03/12] x86: implement array_idx_mask Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <151703973427.26578.15693075353773519333.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  9:14   ` [PATCH v5 04/12] x86: introduce __uaccess_begin_nospec and ifence Ingo Molnar
2018-01-29 20:41     ` Dan Williams
2018-01-30  6:56       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
     [not found] ` <151703974000.26578.2874964402485950653.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  9:19   ` [PATCH v5 05/12] x86, __get_user: use __uaccess_begin_nospec Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <151703974570.26578.3809646715924406820.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  9:25   ` [PATCH v5 06/12] x86, get_user: use pointer masking to limit speculation Ingo Molnar
     [not found] ` <151703975137.26578.11230688940391207602.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-01-28  9:29   ` [PATCH v5 07/12] x86: remove the syscall_64 fast-path Ingo Molnar
2018-01-28 15:22     ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180130065653.gsp7blb3jttd6e6t@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox