From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751880AbeA3M2d (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:28:33 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:54810 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751474AbeA3M2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:28:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:28:29 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Mark Brown Cc: Ladislav Michl , lgirdwood@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, bhumirks@gmail.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com, clayton@craftyguy.net, martijn@brixit.nl, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, Filip =?utf-8?Q?Matijevi=C4=87?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound/tlv320dac33: Add device tree support Message-ID: <20180130122829.GA10373@amd> References: <20180129230539.GA18280@amd> <20180129232031.GA7695@lenoch> <20180129233301.GA18104@amd> <20180130083446.GA13498@lenoch> <20180130085314.GA4585@amd> <20180130113238.GA10525@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180130113238.GA10525@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue 2018-01-30 11:32:38, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:53:14AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: >=20 > > Well, notice I'm converting existing driver to device tree. And that > > one already has GPIO dependency. It is possible that more work needs > > to be done there, but that should not be a reason to delay this. Feel > > free to help. >=20 > No, it's a very good reason to delay merging something. A DT binding is > an ABI so we need to sort out interface issues and describe things as > well as we can, with board files it's not an ABI so we can just do any > old thing that happens to work and while it might not be ideal it > doesn't really matter since we can change it later if we need to. Whatever. Turns out this was GPIO after all. I believe power-gpio and reset-gpio are equiavalent, with different polarity. (After all, devices in reset consume less power). If you prefer one solution over another, let me know... Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlpwZO0ACgkQMOfwapXb+vKxBACgsLBvaOHPfqI2SMfxRvcwWOrs m/sAnREPZZpu8Dv53RkXupfS9xDB7xa+ =VSe0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--