From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:04:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180130150454.GE29098@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d708c09-52a7-a906-b651-b133a7b4f189@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > ------
> > > >
> > > > Changes since V2:
> > > > - Refined the changelog
> > > > - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
> > > > The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
> > > > Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS.
> > > > Handled the corner case when reload_times == 0.
> > > > - Modified the parameter of intel_pmu_save_and_restart_reload()
> > > > Discarded local64_cmpxchg
> > > > - Added fixes tag
> > > > - Added WARN to handle reload_times == 0 || reload_val == 0
> > > >
> > > > Changes since V1:
> > > > - Check PERF_X86_EVENT_AUTO_RELOAD before call
> > > > intel_pmu_save_and_restore()
> > >
> > > It is not yet clear to me why PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD is not allowed
> > > with large PEBS. Large PEBS requires fixed period. So the kernel could
> > > make up the period from the event and store it in the sampling buffer.
> > >
> > > I tried using large PEBS recently, and despite trying different option
> > > combination of perf record, I was not able to get it to work.
> > >
> > > $ perf record -c 1 -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
> > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
> > >
> > > But I was able to make this work with a much older kernel.
> > >
> > > Another annoyance I ran into is with perf record requiring -c period
> > > in order not to set
> > > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD in the event.
> > >
> > > If I do:
> > > perf record -c 1 -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
> > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
> > >
> > > I get
> > >
> > > perf_event_attr:
> > > type 4
> > > size 112
> > > config 0x10d1
> > > { sample_period, sample_freq } 199936
> > > sample_type IP|TID|CPU
> > >
> > > But if I do:
> > > perf record -e cpu/event=0xd1,umask=0x10,period=19936/pp
> > > --no-timestamp --no-period -a -C 0
> > >
> > > I get
> > >
> > > perf_event_attr:
> > > type 4
> > > size 112
> > > config 0x10d1
> > > { sample_period, sample_freq } 199936
> > > sample_type IP|TID|CPU|PERIOD
> > >
> > > Perf should check if all events have a period=, then it should not
> > > pass PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, even
> > > more so when only one event is defined.
> > >
> > > Also it does not seem to honor --no-period.
> >
> > yep, there's a bug in period=x term handling
> > we did not re/set the sample_type based on that
> >
> > attached patch fixes that for me, also takes into account
> > the --no/-period options
> >
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > index f251e824edac..907267206973 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> > @@ -1566,7 +1566,8 @@ static struct option __record_options[] = {
> > OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('T', "timestamp", &record.opts.sample_time,
> > &record.opts.sample_time_set,
> > "Record the sample timestamps"),
> > - OPT_BOOLEAN('P', "period", &record.opts.period, "Record the sample period"),
> > + OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('P', "period", &record.opts.period, &record.opts.period_set,
> > + "Record the sample period"),
> > OPT_BOOLEAN('n', "no-samples", &record.opts.no_samples,
> > "don't sample"),
> > OPT_BOOLEAN_SET('N', "no-buildid-cache", &record.no_buildid_cache,
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.h b/tools/perf/perf.h
> > index 2357f4ccc9c7..cfe46236a5e5 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/perf.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/perf.h
> > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct record_opts {
> > bool sample_time_set;
> > bool sample_cpu;
> > bool period;
> > + bool period_set;
> > bool running_time;
> > bool full_auxtrace;
> > bool auxtrace_snapshot_mode;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index 66fa45198a11..ff359c9ece2e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -745,12 +745,14 @@ static void apply_config_terms(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> > if (!(term->weak && opts->user_interval != ULLONG_MAX)) {
> > attr->sample_period = term->val.period;
> > attr->freq = 0;
> > + perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
> > }
> > break;
> > case PERF_EVSEL__CONFIG_TERM_FREQ:
> > if (!(term->weak && opts->user_freq != UINT_MAX)) {
> > attr->sample_freq = term->val.freq;
> > attr->freq = 1;
> > + perf_evsel__set_sample_bit(evsel, PERIOD);
> > }
>
> If we do so, some events could be in fixed mode without PERIOD set. Other
> events could be in freq mode with PERIOD set.
it also sets the attr->freq, so it's not in fixed mode
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 16:29 [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] perf/x86/intel: fix event update for auto-reload kan.liang
2018-02-06 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-06 17:58 ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-09 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-09 15:49 ` Liang, Kan
2018-02-10 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] perf/x86: introduce read function for x86_pmu kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] perf/x86/intel/ds: introduce read function for large pebs kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/x86/intel: fix pmu read for large PEBS kan.liang
2018-01-29 16:29 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] perf/x86: fix: disable userspace RDPMC usage " kan.liang
2018-01-30 9:16 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] bugs fix for large PEBS mmap read and rdpmc read Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 13:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:59 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 15:04 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-01-30 15:25 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 16:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-30 16:48 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-30 18:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 19:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2018-01-31 3:59 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-31 9:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 13:15 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-31 15:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-01-31 15:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-01-30 14:41 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180130150454.GE29098@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox