From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
dwmw@amazon.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: jpoimboe@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 08:03:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131070300.GA28206@light.dominikbrodowski.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-18bf3c3ea8ece8f03b6fc58508f2dfd23c7711c7@git.kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:39:45PM -0800, tip-bot for Tim Chen wrote:
> Commit-ID: 18bf3c3ea8ece8f03b6fc58508f2dfd23c7711c7
> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/18bf3c3ea8ece8f03b6fc58508f2dfd23c7711c7
> Author: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:04:47 +0000
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CommitDate: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 23:09:21 +0100
>
> x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch
>
> Flush indirect branches when switching into a process that marked itself
> non dumpable. This protects high value processes like gpg better,
> without having too high performance overhead.
For the record, I am still opposed to limit this to non-dumpable processes.
Whether a process needs protection by IBPB on context switches is a
different question to whether a process should be allowed to be dumped,
though the former may be a superset of the latter. In my opinion, IBPB
should be enabled on all context switches to userspace processes, until we
have a clear mitigation strategy for userspace against Spectre-v2 designed
and implemented.
Thanks,
Dominik
--------------------------
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 07:43:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation: Do not limit Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier to non-dumpable processes
Whether a process needs protection by IBPB on context switches is a
different question to whether a process should be allowed to be dumped,
though the former may be a superset of the latter. Enable IBPB on all
context switches to a different userspace process, until we have a clear
mitigation strategy for userspace against Spectre-v2 designed and
implemented.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 012d02624848..f54897b68b16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -255,19 +255,13 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
* predictor when switching between processes. This stops
* one process from doing Spectre-v2 attacks on another.
*
- * As an optimization, flush indirect branches only when
- * switching into processes that disable dumping. This
- * protects high value processes like gpg, without having
- * too high performance overhead. IBPB is *expensive*!
- *
* This will not flush branches when switching into kernel
* threads. It will also not flush if we switch to idle
* thread and back to the same process. It will flush if we
- * switch to a different non-dumpable process.
+ * switch to a different user process.
*/
if (tsk && tsk->mm &&
- tsk->mm->context.ctx_id != last_ctx_id &&
- get_dumpable(tsk->mm) != SUID_DUMP_USER)
+ tsk->mm->context.ctx_id != last_ctx_id)
indirect_branch_prediction_barrier();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-29 22:04 [PATCH] x86/speculation: Use Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier in context switch David Woodhouse
2018-01-30 17:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-30 21:23 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-30 22:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-30 22:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-30 22:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-31 3:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-31 23:25 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-30 20:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-30 21:03 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-30 21:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-30 22:26 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-30 22:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-31 0:25 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-31 0:41 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-30 22:39 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Tim Chen
2018-01-31 7:03 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2018-01-31 13:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-01 8:25 ` Christian Brauner
2018-02-01 8:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 15:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-04 19:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2018-02-05 14:18 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-05 19:35 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180131070300.GA28206@light.dominikbrodowski.net \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).