Re: [PATCH] locking/qspinlock: Ensure node is initialised before updating prev->next

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:20:46PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> index 294294c71ba4..1ebbc366a31d 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> @@ -408,16 +408,15 @@ void queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
>  	 */
>  	if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
>  		prev = decode_tail(old);
> +
>  		/*
> -		 * The above xchg_tail() is also a load of @lock which generates,
> -		 * through decode_tail(), a pointer.
> -		 *
> -		 * The address dependency matches the RELEASE of xchg_tail()
> -		 * such that the access to @prev must happen after.
> +		 * We must ensure that the stores to @node are observed before
> +		 * the write to prev->next. The address dependency on xchg_tail
> +		 * is not sufficient to ensure this because the read component
> +		 * of xchg_tail is unordered with respect to the initialisation
> +		 * of node.
>  		 */
> -		smp_read_barrier_depends();

Right, except you're patching old code here, please try again on a tree
that includes commit:

  548095dea63f ("locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath()")

> -
> -		WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
> +		smp_store_release(prev->next, node);
>  
>  		pv_wait_node(node, prev);
>  		arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked);
> -- 
> 2.1.4
>