From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, ckadabi@codeaurora.org,
dave.martin@arm.com, jnair@caviumnetworks.com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 18:27:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131182807.32134-7-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180131182807.32134-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Now that each capability describes how to treat the conflicts
of CPU cap state vs System wide cap state, we can unify the
verification logic to a single place.
Cc: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 7460b1f7e611..69b5ce366598 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
*
* b) Any late CPU, brought up after (1), the action is triggered via:
* check_local_cpu_capabilities() -> verify_local_cpu_capabilities()
+ * -> __verify_local_cpu_caps()
*
* 5) Conflicts: Based on the state of the capability on a late CPU vs. the system
* state, we could have the following combinations :
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 1b29b3f0a1bc..5e4d581c97f1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1233,6 +1233,56 @@ static void __init enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *
}
}
+/*
+ * Run through the list of capabilities to check for conflicts.
+ * If the system has already detected a capability, take necessary
+ * action on this CPU.
+ *
+ * Returns "false" on conflicts.
+ */
+static bool __verify_local_cpu_caps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
+{
+ bool cpu_has_cap, system_has_cap;
+ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
+
+ for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
+ cpu_has_cap = __this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability);
+ system_has_cap = cpus_have_cap(caps->capability);
+
+ if (system_has_cap) {
+ /*
+ * Check if the new CPU misses an advertised feature, which is not
+ * safe to miss.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_optional(caps))
+ break;
+ /*
+ * We have to issue cpu_enable() irrespective of whether the CPU
+ * has it or not, as it is enabeld system wide. It is upto
+ * the call back to take appropriate action on this CPU.
+ */
+ if (caps->cpu_enable)
+ caps->cpu_enable(caps);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Check if the CPU has this capability if it isn't safe to
+ * have when the system doesn't.
+ */
+ if (cpu_has_cap && !cpucap_late_cpu_permitted(caps))
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (caps->matches) {
+ pr_crit("CPU%d: Detected conflict for capability %d (%s), System: %d, CPU: %d\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), caps->capability,
+ caps->desc, system_has_cap, cpu_has_cap);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Check for CPU features that are used in early boot
* based on the Boot CPU value.
@@ -1255,25 +1305,10 @@ verify_local_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps)
}
}
-static void
-verify_local_cpu_features(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps_list)
+static void verify_local_cpu_features(void)
{
- const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = caps_list;
- for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
- if (!cpus_have_cap(caps->capability))
- continue;
- /*
- * If the new CPU misses an advertised feature, we cannot proceed
- * further, park the cpu.
- */
- if (!__this_cpu_has_cap(caps_list, caps->capability)) {
- pr_crit("CPU%d: missing feature: %s\n",
- smp_processor_id(), caps->desc);
- cpu_die_early();
- }
- if (caps->cpu_enable)
- caps->cpu_enable(caps);
- }
+ if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_features))
+ cpu_die_early();
}
static void verify_sve_features(void)
@@ -1300,20 +1335,8 @@ static void verify_sve_features(void)
*/
static void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
{
- const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = arm64_errata;
-
- for (; caps->matches; caps++) {
- if (cpus_have_cap(caps->capability)) {
- if (caps->cpu_enable)
- caps->cpu_enable(caps);
- } else if (caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU)) {
- pr_crit("CPU%d: Requires work around for %s, not detected"
- " at boot time\n",
- smp_processor_id(),
- caps->desc ? : "an erratum");
- cpu_die_early();
- }
- }
+ if (!__verify_local_cpu_caps(arm64_errata))
+ cpu_die_early();
}
static void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
@@ -1337,7 +1360,7 @@ static void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void)
static void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
{
verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds();
- verify_local_cpu_features(arm64_features);
+ verify_local_cpu_features();
verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 18:27 [PATCH v2 00/20] arm64: Rework cpu capabilities handling Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] arm64: capabilities: Update prototype for enable call back Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:37 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 11:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] arm64: capabilities: Move errata work around check on boot CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:37 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 14:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: capabilities: Move errata processing code Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:37 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for fine grained capabilities Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:37 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 15:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 15:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] arm64: capabilities: Add flags to handle the conflicts on late CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 11:31 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-07 16:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2018-02-07 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] arm64: capabilities: Unify the verification Dave Martin
2018-02-07 16:56 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] arm64: capabilities: Filter the entries based on a given mask Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 17:01 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 12:10 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: capabilities: Allow flexibility in scope Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata workarounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: capabilities: Allow flexibility in scope Dave Martin
2018-02-08 16:31 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 17:32 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-09 12:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: capabilities: Prepare for grouping features and errata work arounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: capabilities: Split the processing of " Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: capabilities: Allow features based on local CPU scope Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 12:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: capabilities: Group handling of features and errata workarounds Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 12:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-09 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: capabilities: Allow flexibility in scope Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] arm64: capabilities: Introduce weak features based on local CPU Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] arm64: capabilities: Restrict KPTI detection to boot-time CPUs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 18:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 11:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] arm64: capabilities: Add support for features enabled early Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-07 18:34 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 11:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] arm64: capabilities: Change scope of VHE to Boot CPU feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] arm64: capabilities: Clean up midr range helpers Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] arm64: Add helpers for checking CPU MIDR against a range Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] arm64: capabilities: Add support for checks based on a list of MIDRs Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] arm64: Handle shared capability entries Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 10:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 12:01 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 12:32 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-09 10:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 12:04 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 12:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] arm64: bp hardening: Allow late CPUs to enable work around Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-02-08 12:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 12:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-08 16:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 17:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-08 17:59 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] arm64: Add MIDR encoding for Arm Cortex-A55 and Cortex-A35 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] arm64: Delay enabling hardware DBM feature Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:40 ` Dave Martin
2018-01-31 18:28 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] arm64: Add work around for Arm Cortex-A55 Erratum 1024718 Suzuki K Poulose
2018-02-07 10:40 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180131182807.32134-7-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ckadabi@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=jnair@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox