From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754434AbeBAAK1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:10:27 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:42515 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209AbeBAAK0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:10:26 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:10:21 +1100 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: checkpatch changes for 4.16 Message-ID: <20180201001021.GB29988@eros> References: <20180131214630.GF11433@eros> <1517438936.7489.8.camel@perches.com> <20180131232358.GA29988@eros> <1517442979.7489.14.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1517442979.7489.14.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:56:19PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:23 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 02:48:56PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 08:46 +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > Can I please bother you with a maintainer question. I know everyone is > > > > super busy right now, I'm asking for a smidgen of your time instead of > > > > doing it wrong and taking up some of Linus' time since it's merge window > > > > and all that. > > > > > > > > I have the checkpatch set queued ready to do a GIT PULL to Linus. My > > > > concern is that the subject line may not be unique if checkpatch changes > > > > are coming in from various trees this merge window. I have tagged the > > > > pull request with > > > > > > Personally, I think you could let Andrew Morton pick them > > > up as very few patches for checkpatch go in any other way. > > > > ok no worries. I'll leave it until a few rc's are out then send to Andrew. > > > > > What patches are you submitting again? > > > > > > Is it just > > > > > > commit 7b1924a1d930 ("vsprintf: add printk specifier %px") > > > > > > or is there something else? > > > > d94e97bc9ede checkpatch: add sub routine get_stat_real() > > d0e27c47f5b9 checkpatch: add sub routine get_stat_here() > > 986b3b5b7d7a checkpatch: warn for use of %px > > 26c1cf882d79 checkpatch: add check for tag Co-Developed-by > > > > I thought it was odd when you said they could go in through _any_ > > tree. Not to worry, it's not urgent. > > Stuff that is going to be pulled should at least > marinate in -next for awhile first and not first > be presented as a pull request. Oh cheers, I forgot about that for leaking_addresses patches too :( thanks, Tobin.