From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] objtool: retpoline validation
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:40:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201154028.GA2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1517499131.18619.317.camel@infradead.org>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:32:11PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 09:28 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:34:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > There are the retpoline validation patches; they work with the
> > > __noretpoline
> > > thing from David.
> > Have you run this through 0-day bot yet? A manual awk/sed found
> > another
> > one, which objtool confirms:
> >
> > drivers/watchdog/.tmp_hpwdt.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x24:
> > indirect call found in RETPOLINE build
> >
> > And my search wasn't exhaustive so it would be good to sic 0-day bot on
> > it.
>
> We discussed that one. It's correct; we're calling into firmware so
> there's *no* point in retpolining that one. We need to set IBRS before
> any runtime calls into firmware, if we want to be safe.
Ideally we'd have a way to mark the module 'unsafe' or something.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 14:34 [PATCH 0/7] objtool: retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] objtool: Use existing global variables for options Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] objtool: Add module specific retpoline rules Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86,nospec: Annotate indirect calls/jumps Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:55 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 15:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-01 15:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/paravirt: Annotate indirect calls Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86: Annotate indirect jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 14:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86,sme: Annotate indirect call Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 15:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] objtool: retpoline validation Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-01 15:32 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-02-01 16:51 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 17:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 17:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-02-01 18:16 ` Tim Chen
2018-02-06 21:23 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-01 15:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180201154028.GA2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox