From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752595AbeBBUkP (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:15 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47894 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752028AbeBBUkH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:07 -0500
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2B96B20855
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 17:40:04 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf tools: Fix period/freq terms setup
Message-ID: <20180202204004.GB8297@kernel.org>
References: <20180201083812.11359-1-jolsa@kernel.org>
 <20180201083812.11359-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
 <CABPqkBSkbq9NnufY1k2de-Fa-Qb0vhN_MGu6mhqNOV-p3CaVLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180202202849.GA8297@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180202202849.GA8297@kernel.org>
X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:28:49PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:45:46AM -0800, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > Otherwise, I tested what you have written so far and it works.
 
> So I take that as a Tested-by: Stephane and will apply the patches, Jiri
> can continue working on these other aspects, right?

I also added this for the casual reader to get up to speed more quickly,
please check that it makes sense.

    Committer note:
    
    When we use -c or a period=N term in the event definition, then we don't
    need to ask the kernel, via perf_event_attr.sample_type |=
    PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD, to put the event period in each sample, as we know
    it already, it is in perf_event_attr.sample_period.

- Arnaldo