From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mchehab@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 13:26:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180208022611.GA3304@eros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180207172624.24555-1-corbet@lwn.net>
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 10:26:16AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> So once upon a time I set out to fix the problem reported by Tobin wherein
> a literal block within a kerneldoc comment would be corrupted in
> processing. On the way, though, I got annoyed at the way I have to learn
> how kernel-doc works from the beginning every time I tear into it.
Awesome. The patch that exposed that problem hasn't landed yet but I
tested this series and can confirm that it fixes it.
FTR to test I did:
- update function docs for include/linux/rcupdate.h:rcu_pointer_hadoff()
removed enclosing '``' and added leading '::'
- apply this series
- rebuild docs
- profit
thanks,
Tobin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-07 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Clean up kernel-doc and fix literal-block handling Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] docs: kernel-doc: Get rid of xml_escape() and friends Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:09 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 13:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] docs: kernel-doc: Rename and split STATE_FIELD Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:20 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NORMAL processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:23 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_NAME " Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:27 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_BODY processing to a separate function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:32 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-09 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-13 10:01 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] docs: kernel-doc: Move STATE_PROTO processing into its own function Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:33 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] docs: kernel-doc: Finish moving STATE_* code out of process_file() Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08 2:29 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-08 19:58 ` Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-09 9:36 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-07 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] docs: kernel-doc: Don't mangle literal code blocks in comments Jonathan Corbet
2018-02-08 2:30 ` Tobin C. Harding
2018-02-09 9:47 ` Jani Nikula
2018-02-14 16:53 ` Markus Heiser
2018-02-08 2:26 ` Tobin C. Harding [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180208022611.GA3304@eros \
--to=me@tobin.cc \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox