From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:19:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e74318e0-0cdf-e55d-bf06-b481541e2697@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Ravi,
On 02/12, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> I'm observing a bug in the uprobe infrastructure.
I am not sure,
> When target binary
> is quite small, uprobe replaces 'trap' instruction at two different
> places. Ex,
but this is actually "the same place" (in the file), just 2 virtual addrs differ,
> (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
> 0x1001069c: 2080899750
>
> Now enable the probe:
>
> # echo 1 > events/probe_a/main/enable
>
> Check probed instruction:
>
> (gdb) disassemble main
> 0x000000001000069c <+8>: trap
>
> *Bug*:
>
> (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
> 0x1001069c: 2145386504
>
> In short, when it replaces the probe instruction, it does some corruption
> in the readonly vma. This seems to be a bug.
>
> How did I get the other address 0x1001069c?I found build_map_info()
> returns these two vmas for the single probe:
>
> 10000000-10010000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 67325595 /home/ravi/a.out
> 10010000-10020000 r--p 00000000 08:05 67325595 /home/ravi/a.out
please note that these 2 vma's mmap the same region in a.out, so
*0x1001069c and *0x1000069c point to the same insn.
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 13:16 Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-12 15:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).