linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:19:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e74318e0-0cdf-e55d-bf06-b481541e2697@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Ravi,

On 02/12, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
>
> I'm observing a bug in the uprobe infrastructure.

I am not sure,

> When target binary
> is quite small, uprobe replaces 'trap' instruction at two different
> places. Ex,

but this is actually "the same place" (in the file), just 2 virtual addrs differ,

>   (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
>     0x1001069c:    2080899750
>
> Now enable the probe:
>
>   # echo 1 > events/probe_a/main/enable
>
> Check probed instruction:
>
>   (gdb) disassemble main
>        0x000000001000069c <+8>:    trap
>
> *Bug*:
>
>   (gdb) x/w 0x1001069c
>     0x1001069c:  2145386504
>
> In short, when it replaces the probe instruction, it does some corruption
> in the readonly vma. This seems to be a bug.
>
> How did I get the other address 0x1001069c?I found build_map_info()
> returns these two vmas for the single probe:
>
>   10000000-10010000 r-xp 00000000 08:05 67325595   /home/ravi/a.out
>   10010000-10020000 r--p 00000000 08:05 67325595   /home/ravi/a.out

please note that these 2 vma's mmap the same region in a.out, so
*0x1001069c and *0x1000069c point to the same insn.

Oleg.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-12 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-12 13:16 Uprobe: Bug(?) when probing small binaries Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-12 15:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180212151935.GA12577@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).