From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com>
Cc: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: backporting "ext4: inplace xattr block update fails to deduplicate blocks" to LTS kernels?
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221114000.GB6555@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3db4b3f-9cb6-c96c-8d31-f2a5f8b4082c@nokia.com>
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Tommi Rantala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.9 (and earlier) LTS kernels are missing this:
>
> commit ec00022030da5761518476096626338bd67df57a
> Author: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
> Date: Sat Aug 5 22:41:42 2017 -0400
>
> ext4: inplace xattr block update fails to deduplicate blocks
>
>
> OK to backport it?
> I tested it briefly in 4.9, seems to work.
>
> One of our testers noticed a glusterfs performance regression when going
> from 4.4 to 4.9, caused by the duplicated blocks.
>
> In I understand everything correctly, in 4.4 mbcache uses the block number
> in the hash table bucket calculation, and the hash table is populated quite
> evenly even if there are duplicates. So the mbcache is fast.
>
> But in later kernels mbcache puts all the duplicate entries into a single
> bucket. As the entries are stored in one big linked list, this obviously
> makes the mbcache slow.
>
>
> I tested this in 4.9 (which still has the ext4_xattr_rehash() call that got
> eliminated in commit "ext4: eliminate xattr entry e_hash recalculation for
> removes"):
I need an ack from the ext4 maintainers before I can take this...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 13:26 backporting "ext4: inplace xattr block update fails to deduplicate blocks" to LTS kernels? Tommi Rantala
2018-02-21 11:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-02-21 15:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-02-22 13:37 ` Tommi Rantala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180221114000.GB6555@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tahsin@google.com \
--cc=tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox