From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933565AbeBVRk2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:40:28 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:52518 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933427AbeBVRk1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:40:27 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:40:24 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: process: Add "Root-caused-by" and "Suggested-by" Message-ID: <20180222104024.60408a75@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180222003749.GA4724@beast> References: <20180222003749.GA4724@beast> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:37:50 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > As recently pointed out by Linus, "Root-caused-by" is a good tag to include > since it can indicate significantly more work than "just" a Reported-by. > This adds it and "Suggested-by" (which was also missing) to the documented > list of tags. Additionally updates checkpatch.pl to match the process docs. So I'm not really opposed to this, but I do wonder if we really need to make a catalog of all the tags that might appear. A quick grep turns up stuff like: Niced-by Based-on-a-patch-by Debugged-by Requested-by Despised-by Improvements-by Tracked-by Analyzed-by Bisected-by Okay-ished-by \o/-by Pointed-at-by Brown-paper-bag-to-be-worn-by Not-longer-ranted-at-by Rightfully-ranted-at-by Helped-by Architected-by Also-posted-by Complained-about-by Mehed-by Reminded-by Actually-written-by Generated-by Historical-research-by Some of these are arguably more useful than others, but I'm not sure we want to bother documenting even an often-used subset of them. That said, we can add this one; I'll take the patch if I get an ack from Joe. jon