From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
aarcange@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, keescook@google.com,
hughd@google.com, jgross@suse.com, x86@kernel.org,
namit@vmware.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 02/10] x86/mm: undo double _PAGE_PSE clearing
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:36:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222203654.F87D4CFF@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222203651.B776810C@viggo.jf.intel.com>
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
When clearing _PAGE_PRESENT on a huge page, we need to be careful
to also clear _PAGE_PSE, otherwise it might still get confused
for a valid large page table entry.
We do that near the spot where we *set* _PAGE_PSE. That's fine,
but it's unnecessary. pgprot_large_2_4k() already did it.
BTW, I also noticed that pgprot_large_2_4k() and
pgprot_4k_2_large() are not symmetric. pgprot_large_2_4k() clears
_PAGE_PSE (because it is aliased to _PAGE_PAT) but
pgprot_4k_2_large() does not put _PAGE_PSE back. Bummer.
Also, add some comments and change "promote" to "move". "Promote"
seems an odd word to move when we are logically moving a bit to a
lower bit position. Also add an extra line return to make it clear
to which line the comment applies.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
---
b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c~kpti-undo-double-_PAGE_PSE-clear arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c~kpti-undo-double-_PAGE_PSE-clear 2018-02-22 12:36:18.072036555 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c 2018-02-22 12:36:18.076036555 -0800
@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns
* up accordingly.
*/
old_pte = *kpte;
+ /* Clear PSE (aka _PAGE_PAT) and move PAT bit to correct position */
req_prot = pgprot_large_2_4k(old_prot);
pgprot_val(req_prot) &= ~pgprot_val(cpa->mask_clr);
@@ -597,8 +598,6 @@ try_preserve_large_page(pte_t *kpte, uns
req_prot = pgprot_clear_protnone_bits(req_prot);
if (pgprot_val(req_prot) & _PAGE_PRESENT)
pgprot_val(req_prot) |= _PAGE_PSE;
- else
- pgprot_val(req_prot) &= ~_PAGE_PSE;
req_prot = canon_pgprot(req_prot);
/*
@@ -684,8 +683,12 @@ __split_large_page(struct cpa_data *cpa,
switch (level) {
case PG_LEVEL_2M:
ref_prot = pmd_pgprot(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
- /* clear PSE and promote PAT bit to correct position */
+ /*
+ * Clear PSE (aka _PAGE_PAT) and move
+ * PAT bit to correct position.
+ */
ref_prot = pgprot_large_2_4k(ref_prot);
+
ref_pfn = pmd_pfn(*(pmd_t *)kpte);
break;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 20:36 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Use global pages with PTI Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] x86/mm: factor out pageattr _PAGE_GLOBAL setting Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:36 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-02-22 20:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] x86/mm: introduce "default" kernel PTE mask Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 22:21 ` Nadav Amit
2018-02-22 22:26 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 23:11 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-02-23 23:46 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] x86/espfix: use kernel-default " Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 21:27 ` Nadav Amit
2018-02-22 21:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 21:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-22 22:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] x86/mm: do not auto-massage page protections Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 21:46 ` Nadav Amit
2018-02-22 21:52 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] x86/mm: remove extra filtering in pageattr code Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] x86/mm: comment _PAGE_GLOBAL mystery Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] x86/mm: do not forbid _PAGE_RW before init for __ro_after_init Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:53 ` Kees Cook
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] x86/pti: enable global pages for shared areas Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] x86/pti: clear _PAGE_GLOBAL for kernel image Dave Hansen
2018-02-22 21:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Use global pages with PTI Linus Torvalds
2018-02-24 1:49 ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-24 4:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-24 4:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Use global pages with PTI - Truth about the white man thetruthbeforeus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222203654.F87D4CFF@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox