From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/xchg/alpha: Use smp_mb() in place of __ASM__MB
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:46:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222214625.GM2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519291469-5702-1-git-send-email-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:24:29AM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> Replace each occurrence of __ASM__MB with a (trailing) smp_mb() in
> xchg(), cmpxchg(), and remove the now unused __ASM__MB definitions;
> this improves readability, with no additional synchronization cost.
>
> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
I am a bit confused by the use of out-of-line branches to do a backwards
branch, but those were in place to start with. Maybe the point is to
defeat backwards-branch prediction or some such.
Regardless...
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
> Cc: linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 6 ------
> arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> index 46ebf14aed4e5..8a2b331e43feb 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
> * Atomic exchange routines.
> */
>
> -#define __ASM__MB
> #define ____xchg(type, args...) __xchg ## type ## _local(args)
> #define ____cmpxchg(type, args...) __cmpxchg ## type ## _local(args)
> #include <asm/xchg.h>
> @@ -33,10 +32,6 @@
> cmpxchg_local((ptr), (o), (n)); \
> })
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -#undef __ASM__MB
> -#define __ASM__MB "\tmb\n"
> -#endif
> #undef ____xchg
> #undef ____cmpxchg
> #define ____xchg(type, args...) __xchg ##type(args)
> @@ -64,7 +59,6 @@
> cmpxchg((ptr), (o), (n)); \
> })
>
> -#undef __ASM__MB
> #undef ____cmpxchg
>
> #endif /* _ALPHA_CMPXCHG_H */
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> index e2660866ce972..e1facf6fc2446 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/xchg.h
> @@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ ____xchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned long val)
> " or %1,%2,%2\n"
> " stq_c %2,0(%3)\n"
> " beq %2,2f\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "2: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -52,12 +52,12 @@ ____xchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned long val)
> " or %1,%2,%2\n"
> " stq_c %2,0(%3)\n"
> " beq %2,2f\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "2: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (val), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "1" (val) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ ____xchg(_u32, volatile int *m, unsigned long val)
> " bis $31,%3,%1\n"
> " stl_c %1,%2\n"
> " beq %1,2f\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "2: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
> : "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return val;
> }
> @@ -92,12 +92,12 @@ ____xchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long val)
> " bis $31,%3,%1\n"
> " stq_c %1,%2\n"
> " beq %1,2f\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "2: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (val), "=&r" (dummy), "=m" (*m)
> : "rI" (val), "m" (*m) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return val;
> }
> @@ -150,12 +150,12 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u8, volatile char *m, unsigned char old, unsigned char new)
> " stq_c %2,0(%4)\n"
> " beq %2,3f\n"
> "2:\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "3: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u16, volatile short *m, unsigned short old, unsigned short new)
> " stq_c %2,0(%4)\n"
> " beq %2,3f\n"
> "2:\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "3: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r" (prev), "=&r" (new), "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (cmp), "=&r" (addr64)
> : "r" ((long)m), "Ir" (old), "1" (new) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -200,12 +200,12 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u32, volatile int *m, int old, int new)
> " stl_c %1,%2\n"
> " beq %1,3f\n"
> "2:\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "3: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
> : "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> @@ -223,12 +223,12 @@ ____cmpxchg(_u64, volatile long *m, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
> " stq_c %1,%2\n"
> " beq %1,3f\n"
> "2:\n"
> - __ASM__MB
> ".subsection 2\n"
> "3: br 1b\n"
> ".previous"
> : "=&r"(prev), "=&r"(cmp), "=m"(*m)
> : "r"((long) old), "r"(new), "m"(*m) : "memory");
> + smp_mb();
>
> return prev;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-22 9:24 [PATCH 1/2] locking/xchg/alpha: Use smp_mb() in place of __ASM__MB Andrea Parri
2018-02-22 21:46 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-02-23 8:27 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/xchg/alpha: Clean up barrier usage by using " tip-bot for Andrea Parri
2018-02-26 18:05 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222214625.GM2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox