From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752130AbeBZC7D (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 21:59:03 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:7891 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751945AbeBZC7C (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 21:59:02 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,395,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="206919856" Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:57:28 +0800 From: Ye Xiaolong To: Shakeel Butt Cc: Linus Torvalds , Vlastimil Babka , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Huang Ying , Tim Chen , Michal Hocko , Greg Thelen , Johannes Weiner , Balbir Singh , Minchan Kim , Shaohua Li , Jan Kara , Nicholas Piggin , Dan Williams , Mel Gorman , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , LKML , lkp@01.org Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [mm, mlock, vmscan] 9c4e6b1a70: stress-ng.hdd.ops_per_sec -7.9% regression Message-ID: <20180226025728.GA8942@yexl-desktop> References: <20180225144421.GB7144@yexl-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Shakeel On 02/25, Shakeel Butt wrote: >On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:44 AM, kernel test robot > wrote: >> >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -7.9% regression of stress-ng.hdd.ops_per_sec due to commit: >> >> >> commit: 9c4e6b1a7027f102990c0395296015a812525f4d ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs") >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master >> >> in testcase: stress-ng >> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 128G memory >> with following parameters: >> > >Hi Xiaolong, > >Is there a way I can get the output of "perf record -a -g" running in >parallel to the actual test on this machine. As I have mentioned >before I am not able to reproduce this issue. However I am trying to >repro on a VM with 4 vcpus and 4 GiB memory and I don't see any >difference. I am suspecting that it may repro on a larger machine but >I don't have access to one. > perf.data attached. It was generated via `perf record -q -ag --realtime=1 -m 256` Thanks, Xiaolong >thanks, >Shakeel