From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, josh@joshtriplett.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove the unnecessary separate function, rcu_preempt_do_callback()
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:22:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226182254.GU2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226121514.122669b9@vmware.local.home>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:15:14PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:11:36 +0900
> Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> wrote:
>
> > rcu_preemptp_do_callback() was introduced in commit 09223371dea(rcu:
> > Use softirq to address performance regression), where it had to be
> > distinguished between in the case CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU is set and
> > it's not.
> >
> > Now that the code was cleaned up so that rcu_preemt_do_callback() is
> > only called in rcu_kthread_do_work() in the same file, tree_plugin.h,
> > we don't have to keep the separate function anymore. Remove it for a
> > better readability.
>
> Looks good to me (looks like commit f8b7fc6b51 "rcu: use softirq
> instead of kthreads except when RCU_BOOST=y" cleaned up the ifdefs and
> removed the requirement).
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Thank you both! I have queued a slightly modified patch for testing
and further review. Please see below and let me know if I messed
something up.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit b8a3012ddba397d4a18d9fd4a00432f8c2626bd6
Author: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Date: Mon Feb 26 14:11:36 2018 +0900
rcu: Inline rcu_preempt_do_callback() into its sole caller
The rcu_preempt_do_callbacks() function was introduced in commit
09223371dea(rcu: Use softirq to address performance regression), where it
was necessary to handle kernel builds both containing and not containing
RCU-preempt. Since then, various changes (most notably f8b7fc6b51
("rcu: use softirq instead of kthreads except when RCU_BOOST=y")) have
resulted in this function being invoked only from rcu_kthread_do_work(),
which is present only in kernels containing RCU-preempt, which in turn
means that the rcu_preempt_do_callbacks() function is no longer needed.
This commit therefore inlines rcu_preempt_do_callbacks() into its
sole remaining caller and also removes the rcu_state_p and rcu_data_p
indirection for added clarity.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
[ paulmck: Remove the rcu_state_p and rcu_data_p indirection. ]
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index dc6f2319fc21..9dd0ea77faed 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -449,7 +449,6 @@ static void rcu_preempt_boost_start_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
static void invoke_rcu_callbacks_kthread(void);
static bool rcu_is_callbacks_kthread(void);
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
-static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void);
static int rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
struct rcu_node *rnp);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 26d7a31e81cb..b0d7f9ba6bf2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -686,15 +686,6 @@ static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(void)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
-
-static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void)
-{
- rcu_do_batch(rcu_state_p, this_cpu_ptr(rcu_data_p));
-}
-
-#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
-
/**
* call_rcu() - Queue an RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
* @head: structure to be used for queueing the RCU updates.
@@ -1170,7 +1161,7 @@ static void rcu_kthread_do_work(void)
{
rcu_do_batch(&rcu_sched_state, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_sched_data));
rcu_do_batch(&rcu_bh_state, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_bh_data));
- rcu_preempt_do_callbacks();
+ rcu_do_batch(&rcu_preempt_state, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_preempt_data));
}
static void rcu_cpu_kthread_setup(unsigned int cpu)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-26 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 5:11 [PATCH] rcu: Remove the unnecessary separate function, rcu_preempt_do_callback() Byungchul Park
2018-02-26 17:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-26 18:22 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-02-26 23:35 ` Byungchul Park
2018-02-26 23:40 ` Byungchul Park
2018-02-26 23:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180226182254.GU2855@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox