From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ppc64le save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable (Was: HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE)
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:09:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227160924.GA19111@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1712121308440.21907@pobox.suse.cz>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 01:12:37PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
> I think that this is not enough. You need to also implement
> save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() for powerpc defined as __weak in
> kernel/stacktrace.c.
So here is my initial proposal. I'd really like to get the successful
exit stricter, i.e. hit the initial stack value exactly instead of just
a window. Also, the check for kernel code looks clumsy IMHO. IOW:
Comments more than welcome!
Most of it is Copy&Waste, nonetheless:
Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
index d534ed901538..e08af49e71d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
+#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -76,3 +77,58 @@ save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
save_context_stack(trace, regs->gpr[1], current, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_stack_trace_regs);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
+int
+save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable(struct task_struct *tsk,
+ struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+ unsigned long sp;
+ unsigned long stack_page = (unsigned long)task_stack_page(tsk);
+ /* the last frame (unwinding first) may not yet have saved its LR onto the stack. */
+ int firstframe = 1;
+
+ if (tsk == current)
+ sp = current_stack_pointer();
+ else
+ sp = tsk->thread.ksp;
+
+ if (sp < stack_page + sizeof(struct thread_struct)
+ || sp > stack_page + THREAD_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD)
+ return 1;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ unsigned long *stack = (unsigned long *) sp;
+ unsigned long newsp, ip;
+
+ newsp = stack[0];
+ /* Stack grows downwards; unwinder may only go up */
+ if (newsp <= sp)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (newsp >= stack_page + THREAD_SIZE)
+ return 1; /* invalid backlink, too far up! */
+
+ /* Examine the saved LR: it must point into kernel code. */
+ ip = stack[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+ if ( (ip & 0xEFFF000000000000) != CONFIG_KERNEL_START
+ && !firstframe)
+ return 1;
+ firstframe = 0;
+
+ if (!trace->skip)
+ trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = ip;
+ else
+ trace->skip--;
+
+ if (newsp > stack_page + THREAD_SIZE - STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD)
+ break; /* hit the window for last frame */
+
+ if (trace->nr_entries >= trace->max_entries)
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ sp = newsp;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20171004152516.25803-1-kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20171005124313.GA25100@lst.de>
[not found] ` <9f388c9a-8d74-865a-b113-f77322918b39@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20171017144733.GB2136@lst.de>
[not found] ` <95e6f942-88b7-0208-0eb0-2f5462aec410@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20171020120739.GA20306@lst.de>
[not found] ` <1508547548.5662.2.camel@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <39bb7180-1adf-4df6-c9ba-c6f92754767f@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-12-12 11:39 ` [PATCH] On ppc64le we HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE Torsten Duwe
2017-12-12 12:12 ` Miroslav Benes
2017-12-12 13:02 ` Torsten Duwe
2018-02-27 16:09 ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2018-03-08 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] ppc64le save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable (Was: HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE) Balbir Singh
2018-03-09 15:54 ` Torsten Duwe
2017-12-12 14:05 ` [PATCH] On ppc64le we HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-15 9:40 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-12-18 2:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-18 3:39 ` Balbir Singh
2017-12-18 4:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-18 5:33 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-12-18 18:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-19 2:46 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-12-19 11:28 ` Torsten Duwe
2017-12-19 21:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-21 12:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-23 4:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227160924.GA19111@lst.de \
--to=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox