From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
Cc: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jasowang@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:28:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227222806-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180227085458.h5dytkwaeczrrijr@dhcp-192-241.str.redhat.com>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 09:54:58AM +0100, Jens Freimann wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 07:18:00PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h | 18 +++++++++-
> > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > index 308e2096291f..e3d077ef5207 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
> > * transport being used (eg. virtio_ring), the rest are per-device feature
> > * bits. */
> > #define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_START 28
> > -#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 34
> > +#define VIRTIO_TRANSPORT_F_END 37
> >
> > #ifndef VIRTIO_CONFIG_NO_LEGACY
> > /* Do we get callbacks when the ring is completely used, even if we've
> > @@ -71,4 +71,20 @@
> > * this is for compatibility with legacy systems.
> > */
> > #define VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM 33
> > +
> > +/* This feature indicates support for the packed virtqueue layout. */
> > +#define VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED 34
>
> Spec says VIRTIO_F_PACKED_RING not RING_PACKED
I changed that now :)
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This feature indicates that all buffers are used by the device
> > + * in the same order in which they have been made available.
> > + */
> > +#define VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER 35
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This feature indicates that drivers pass extra data (besides
> > + * identifying the Virtqueue) in their device notifications.
> > + */
> > +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA 36
> > +
> > #endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > index 6d5d5faa989b..77b1d4aeef72 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> > /* This means the buffer contains a list of buffer descriptors. */
> > #define VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT 4
> >
> > +#define VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(b) ((b) << 7)
> > +#define VRING_DESC_F_USED(b) ((b) << 15)
> > +
> > /* The Host uses this in used->flags to advise the Guest: don't kick me when
> > * you add a buffer. It's unreliable, so it's simply an optimization. Guest
> > * will still kick if it's out of buffers. */
> > @@ -104,6 +107,36 @@ struct vring {
> > struct vring_used *used;
> > };
> >
> > +struct vring_packed_desc_event {
> > + /* Descriptor Event Offset */
> > + __virtio16 desc_event_off : 15,
> > + /* Descriptor Event Wrap Counter */
> > + desc_event_wrap : 1;
> > + /* Descriptor Event Flags */
> > + __virtio16 desc_event_flags : 2;
> > +};
>
> Where would the virtqueue number go in driver notifications?
>
> regards,
> Jens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-23 11:17 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for virtio Tiwei Bie
2018-02-23 11:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines Tiwei Bie
2018-02-27 8:54 ` Jens Freimann
2018-02-27 9:18 ` Jens Freimann
2018-02-27 12:01 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-02-27 20:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2018-02-27 9:26 ` David Laight
2018-02-27 11:31 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-02-23 11:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] virtio_ring: support packed ring Tiwei Bie
2018-03-16 4:03 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-16 6:10 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-03-16 6:44 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-16 7:40 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-03-16 8:34 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-16 10:04 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-03-16 11:36 ` Jason Wang
2018-03-16 14:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-03-21 7:35 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-03-21 7:30 ` Tiwei Bie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-14 2:37 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for vhost Jason Wang
2018-02-14 2:37 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio: introduce packed ring defines Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227222806-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).