public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: Optimize add_interrupt_randomness
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:02:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228230210.GC3862@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228214328.23108-1-andi@firstfloor.org>

Thanks, applied.

					- Ted

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:43:28PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> add_interrupt_randomess always wakes up
> code blocking on /dev/random. This wake up is done
> unconditionally. Unfortunately this means all interrupts
> take the wait queue spinlock, which can be rather expensive
> on large systems processing lots of interrupts.
> 
> We saw 1% cpu time spinning on this on a large macro workload
> running on a large system.
> 
> I believe it's a recent regression (?)
> 
> Always check if there is a waiter on the wait queue
> before waking up. This check can be done without
> taking a spinlock.
> 
> 1.06%         10460  [kernel.vmlinux] [k] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>          |
>          ---native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
>             |
>              --0.57%--_raw_spin_lock_irqsave
>                        |
>                         --0.56%--__wake_up_common_lock
>                                   credit_entropy_bits
>                                   add_interrupt_randomness
>                                   handle_irq_event_percpu
>                                   handle_irq_event
>                                   handle_edge_irq
>                                   handle_irq
>                                   do_IRQ
>                                   common_interrupt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-28 21:43 [PATCH] random: Optimize add_interrupt_randomness Andi Kleen
2018-02-28 23:02 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180228230210.GC3862@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox