From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having semaphore
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:25:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228232551.5e99736b4b4fd209e492cd4d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180228075345.674-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Ravi,
Thank you for your great work!
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 13:23:41 +0530
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Userspace Statically Defined Tracepoints[1] are dtrace style markers
> inside userspace applications. These markers are added by developer at
> important places in the code. Each marker source expands to a single
> nop instruction in the compiled code but there may be additional
> overhead for computing the marker arguments which expands to couple of
> instructions. If this computaion is quite more, execution of it can be
> ommited by runtime if() condition when no one is tracing on the marker:
>
> if (semaphore > 0) {
> Execute marker instructions;
> }
>
> Default value of semaphore is 0. Tracer has to increment the semaphore
> before recording on a marker and decrement it at the end of tracing.
>
> Currently, perf tool has limited supports for SDT markers. I.e. it
> can not trace markers surrounded by semaphore. Also, it's not easy
> to add semaphore flip logic in userspace tool like perf, so basic
> idea for this patchset is to add semaphore flip logic in the
> trace_uprobe infrastructure. Ex,[2]
>
> # cat tick.c
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> DTRACE_PROBE1(tick, loop1, i);
> if (TICK_LOOP2_ENABLED()) {
> DTRACE_PROBE1(tick, loop2, i);
> }
> printf("hi: %d\n", i);
> sleep(1);
> }
> ...
>
> Here tick:loop1 is marker without semaphore where as tick:loop2 is
> surrounded by semaphore.
>
>
> # perf buildid-cache --add /tmp/tick
> # perf probe sdt_tick:loop1
> # perf probe sdt_tick:loop2
>
> # perf stat -e sdt_tick:loop1,sdt_tick:loop2 -- /tmp/tick
> hi: 0
> hi: 1
> hi: 2
> ^C
> Performance counter stats for '/tmp/tick':
> 3 sdt_tick:loop1
> 0 sdt_tick:loop2
> 2.747086086 seconds time elapsed
>
>
> Perf failed to record data for tick:loop2. Same experiment with this
> patch series:
>
>
> # readelf -n ./tick
> Provider: tick
> Name: loop2
> ... Semaphore: 0x0000000010020036
>
> # readelf -SW ./tick | grep probes
> [25] .probes PROGBITS 0000000010020034 010034
>
>
> Semaphore offset is 0x10036. I don't have educated 'perf probe'
> about semaphore. So instead of using 'perf probe' command, I'm
> manually adding entry in the <tracefs>/uprobe_events file.
Ok, it is easy to pass semaphore address via perf probe :)
> Special char * denotes semaphore offset.
>
>
> # echo "p:sdt_tick/loop2 /tmp/tick:0x6e4 *0x10036" > uprobe_events
IMHO, this syntax is no good, separate with space is only for arguments.
Since the semaphore is per-probe-point based, that should be specified with probe point.
(there are no 2 or more semaphores on 1 event, are there?)
So something like
# echo "p:sdt_tick/loop2 /tmp/tick:0x6e4(0x10036)" > uprobe_events
would be better to me.
Thank you,
>
> # perf stat -e sdt_tick:loop2 -- /tmp/tick
> hi: 0
> hi: 1
> hi: 2
> hi: 3
> ^C
> Performance counter stats for '/tmp/tick':
> 4 sdt_tick:loop2
> 3.359047827 seconds time elapsed
>
>
> Feedback?
>
> TODO:
> - Educate perf tool about semaphore.
> - perf_event_open() now suppoers {k,u}probe event creation[3]. If we
> can supply semaphore offset in perf_event_attr, perf_event_open()
> can be educated to probe SDT marker having semaphore. Though, both
> config1 and config2 are already being used for uprobe and I don't
> see any other attribute which I can use for semaphore offset. Can
> we introduce one more config there? config3?
>
> [1] https://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/UserSpaceProbeImplementation
> [2] https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/327#issuecomment-200576506
> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/6/976
>
>
> Ravi Bangoria (4):
> Uprobe: Rename map_info to uprobe_map_info
> Uprobe: Export few functions / data structures
> trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having semaphore
> trace_uprobe: Fix multiple update of same semaphores
>
> include/linux/uprobes.h | 25 +++++
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 43 ++++----
> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 244 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-28 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-28 7:53 [RFC 0/4] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having semaphore Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 7:53 ` [RFC 1/4] Uprobe: Rename map_info to uprobe_map_info Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 12:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-03-01 5:11 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 7:53 ` [RFC 2/4] Uprobe: Export few functions / data structures Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 12:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2018-03-01 5:25 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 7:53 ` [RFC 3/4] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having semaphore Ravi Bangoria
2018-03-01 14:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-02 3:54 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-03-06 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-03-07 8:46 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-03-07 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-28 7:53 ` [RFC 4/4] trace_uprobe: Fix multiple update of same semaphores Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 12:06 ` [RFC 0/4] trace_uprobe: Support SDT markers having semaphore Srikar Dronamraju
2018-03-01 5:10 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-02-28 14:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2018-03-01 5:32 ` Ravi Bangoria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180228232551.5e99736b4b4fd209e492cd4d@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox